MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When I was looking at the Gaussian Copula Example @

I realized the Gaussian Copula is stated as follow \begin{equation} C^{Gauss}_\Sigma (u) = \frac{1}{\sqrt\det{\Sigma}} \exp{\Bigg ( -\frac{1}{2} \begin{pmatrix} \Phi^{-1}(u_1) \\ \dots \\ \Phi^{-1}(u_d)\end{pmatrix}^T. (\Sigma^{-1} - I).\begin{pmatrix} \Phi^{-1}(u_1) \\ \dots \\ \Phi^{-1}(u_d)\end{pmatrix} \Bigg) } \end{equation} where $\Sigma$ is the correlation matrix, $\Phi^{-1}$ is the inverse cumulative distribution function of a standard normal and $I$ is the identity matrix.

The question is, why is there an identity matrix in the exponential form?

Thank you

share|cite|improve this question

It's the jacobian.

share|cite|improve this answer

It is the Jacobian which appears in the density. Really there should be some $\text{d}u$ terms to make it clearer that it is not the probability distribution function.

What's a good reference for this derivation (online)? Wikipedia only has an advertisement for someone's book as a reference.

I find this presentation very confusing, for example I had been missing that this was the density (small c) as opposed to the CDF and was obviously not making any sense of it. I can imagine other readers doing the same thing.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.