MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $w(t,x)$ is a solution of wave equation $$ w_{tt}-\triangle w = 0, w(0)=w_0, w_t(0)=w_1, $$ then $w$ satisfies the following Strichartz esitmates $$ \|w\|_{L^q_tL^r_x} \lesssim \|w_0\|_{H^1} + \|w_1\|_{L^2} $$ where $L^q_tL^r_x = L^q_t(0,\infty;L^r_x)$, $(q,r)$ is a wave admissable pair, and satifies $$ \frac{1}{q} + \frac{n}{r} = \frac{n}{2} - 1. $$

Now, let us consider the damped wave equation $$ w_{tt} + w_t -\triangle w = 0, w(0)=w_0, w_t(0)=w_1. $$ It's easy to check that the above Strichartz estimates hold. My question is that, whether these estimates hold for some other pair $(q,r)$ not concluded above. In other words, whether the strichartz estimates of solution for damped wave equation hold for larger range of $(q,r)$?

share|cite|improve this question
Yes, the range of $q$ will be enlargeed. – Wang Ming May 7 '12 at 4:24
The Strichartz estimate you have written is wrong, both the admissibility condition on the indices and the loss of derivatives the initial data. Please check the relevant literature. Moreover, I do not think you can get a scale invariant estimate for a non-scale-invariant equation – Piero D'Ancona May 7 '12 at 15:01

Not sure, but it seems to me that one hardly can expect new Strichartz exponents for the weakly damped wave equation ( the equation you wrote). The reason is that such damped wave equation can be transformed to pure wave equation just by change of variables $v(t)=e^\frac{t}{2}w(t)$. Thus, solutions of the weakly damped wave equation and pure wave equation differ just by factor $e^\frac{t}{2}$. Nevertheless this dissipation term ( $\partial_t w$) plays important role in the long time dynamics of semi-linear damped wave equations ( see )

Also new Strichartz exponents can be obtained by strengthening the dissipation term. For example, one can change term $\partial_t w$ to $(-\Delta)^\frac{1}{2}\partial_t w$ Then the corresponding solution possesses also $L^2([0,T];H^\frac{3}{2}(\Omega))$ regularity. Furthermore, this extra space-time norm can be controlled by energy norm of initial data even in semi-linear case ( see ).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.