MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I came across this complex function in my work $f(z)=\frac{e^z-1}{z}$. Is there a reference to $f(z)$? What is its name in the literature? More importantly, is the function inversible? If so, what is $f^{-1}(z)$? Thanks.

share|cite|improve this question
I don't know about the name, but certainly it can't be globally invertible. For example, it assumes the value 0 infinitely often. The only invertible global holomorphic functions are the polynomials of degree 1. – Angelo May 2 '12 at 10:08
Thanks, if I write the function as a series instead, i.e. $f(z) = \sum_{k=0}^\infty \frac{z^k}{(k+1)!}$, is it invertible? – Minh-Tri Pham May 2 '12 at 11:19
It is strictly increasing on the reals, so it is invertible there. – Gerald Edgar May 2 '12 at 12:51
The Wikipedia article gives a series for 1/f(z), but the question was about $f^{-1}(z)$. – Michael Renardy May 2 '12 at 15:00
up vote 12 down vote accepted

Let $y=(e^z-1)/z$ and $x=-1/y$. Then $xe^x=(x-z)e^{x-z}$. Hence $$x-z=W(xe^x).$$ Here W is an appropriately chosen branch of the Lambert function (ProductLog[-1,.] in Mathematica).

share|cite|improve this answer
Interesting. Of course $x=W(x e^x)$ for some other branch of $W$. – Gerald Edgar May 2 '12 at 15:25
1 I guess this means: solutions to $y=f(z)$ are $$ z=-\frac{1 + W_k \left(-\frac{\operatorname{e} ^{-1/y}}{y}\right) y}{y} $$ where $W_k$ are the branches of the Lambert W function. – Gerald Edgar May 2 '12 at 15:37
We need to rule out the principal branch of the Lambert function, which would simply give z=0. – Michael Renardy May 2 '12 at 15:51
Thanks. This is precisely the answer I have been looking for. – Minh-Tri Pham May 2 '12 at 16:32

As for the name, according to wikipedia the Todd genus is given by:


So, $f(z)=1/\mathrm{Td}(-z)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Interesting, but does not answer the question. Why the upvotes??? – András Bátkai May 2 '12 at 19:55
@András Bátkai: probably because it's a near-answer ["$1/{\rm Td}(-z)$" feels closer to a named function than "$(e^z-1)/z$"] and makes a possibly unexpected connection with research-level mathematics. – Noam D. Elkies May 3 '12 at 0:56
@András Bátkai: Let's not be competitive - if someone posts a useful answer/remark I'm glad to upvote it. – Qfwfq May 3 '12 at 7:50
There was no competitiveness. I was just surprised that the accepted answer got (at the time) less upvote then this one. Which is, of course, informative. – András Bátkai May 3 '12 at 8:20

the coefficients of $f^{-1}(z)$ is just bernoulli numbers


and we have Bernoulli numbers of higher order $\alpha$


where $\alpha=-1$ in the case $f(z)$ and Todd genus can be computed in terms of Bernoulli numbers

share|cite|improve this answer

A related thread (about relations between two real branches of lambert function):

Equation between the two branches of the lambert w function

A (perhaps more complete?) solution involving both the real branches could be written as:

$z=W_0(-\frac{e^\frac{-1}{f}}{f})-W_{-1}(-\frac{e^\frac{-1}{f}}{f})=-\frac{1}{f}-W_{-1}(-\frac{e^\frac{-1}{f}}{f})$ for $f >1 $

$z=W_{-1}(-\frac{e^\frac{-1}{f}}{f})-W_{0}(-\frac{e^\frac{-1}{f}}{f})=-\frac{1}{f}-W_{0}(-\frac{e^\frac{-1}{f}}{f})$ for $f < 1 $

share|cite|improve this answer
This does not provide an answer to the question. To critique or request clarification from an author, leave a comment below their post - you can always comment on your own posts, and once you have sufficient reputation you will be able to comment on any post. – Stefan Kohl Feb 12 '15 at 21:47
I have edited my post adding details and providing an answer to the question. – giorgiomugnaini Feb 14 '15 at 9:29

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.