Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Consider the abelian category $\mathsf{finAb}$ of finite abelian groups. It is easy to prove that there is an isomorphism $\mathrm{ord} : K_0(\mathsf{finAb}) \to \mathbb{Q}^+$. Can you give a reference in the literature for that? More generally:

Question. Is there any more concrete description of the Waldhausen's K-theory space $\Omega |w S_{\bullet} \mathsf{finAb}|$? What is known about its homotopy groups, that is the $K$-theory groups $K_n(\mathsf{finAb})$ for $n>0$?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 11 down vote accepted

Everything is known. In fact as spectra we have canonically $K(\mathsf{finAb}) = \vee_p K(\mathbb{F}_p)$, and the spectra $K(\mathbb{F}_p)$ are identified in the work of Quillen (see e.g. http://www.math.uiuc.edu/K-theory/1006/). In particular on $\pi_0$ we find $K_0(\mathsf{finAb}) = \oplus_p \mathbb{Z}$, agreeing with your claim, and on $\pi_n$ for $n>0$ we find that $K_n(\mathsf{finAb})$ is $0$ for $n$ even and is $\oplus_p \mathbb{Z}/(p^k-1)$ (non-canonically) for $n = 2k-1$.

To justify the claimed equality $K(\mathsf{finAb}) = \vee_p K(\mathbb{F}_p)$, note first that $\mathsf{finAb}$ is the filtered colimit over increasing finite sets of primes $P$ of the variant $\mathsf{finAb}_P$ where only products of $p$-groups for $p \in P$ are allowed; since K-theory commutes with filtered colimits, it then suffices to show that each $K(\mathsf{finAb}_P) = \prod_{p\in P} K(\mathbb{F}_p)$ and that for $P \subseteq P'$ this identification intertwines the inclusion $K(\mathsf{finAb}_P) \to K(\mathsf{finAb}_{P'})$ with the evident map $\prod_{p\in P} K(\mathbb{F}_p) \to \prod_{p\in P'} K(\mathbb{F}_p)$ which is zero outside of $P$.

But $\mathsf{finAb}_P$ is just the product over $p \in P$ of the categories $\mathsf{finAb}_p$, whose K-theory identifies with that of vector spaces over $\mathbb{F}_p$ by Quillen's devissage theorem. And K-theory commutes with finite products, so that's that.

Here I guess I was actually arguing using Quillen's Q-construction instead of Waldhausen's $S_{\bullet}$-construction. Otherwise I'm not sure how to justify the last step, the devissage. Actually I'm sure all of the above is in Quillen's paper on the Q-construction.

share|improve this answer
2  
Perhaps it should also be stated that when $w = i =$ isomorphisms, the Quillen $K$-theory space of an exact category $C$ has the homotopy type of Waldhausen's $\Omega |i S_\bullet C|$. –  John Klein Apr 29 '12 at 23:00
    
@Dustin: Thanks! I've added the LaTeX. So the following question seems to remain: Is there some kind of devissage for Waldhausen's K-theory? –  Martin Brandenburg Apr 30 '12 at 6:34
    
Martin: Yeah. As John points out, of course in some sense there is, since the S-dot construction identifies with the Q-construction in the case at hand. But one might ask what goes on when C is not an exact category. I would ask Clark Barwick, since I know he's been thinking about this sort of thing. –  Dustin Clausen Apr 30 '12 at 19:14
    
A proof of Devissage that only uses the S-construction can be found in Ross Staffeldt's paper "On fundamental theorems of algebraic K-theory". Anyway, Waldhausen gives a natural zig-zag of weak equivalences between the S and the Q-constructions. –  K.J. Moi Oct 22 '13 at 13:49
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.