Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I'm pretty sure that the following (if true) is a standard result in linear algebra but unfortunately I could not find it anywhere and even worse I'm too dumb to prove it: Let $k$ be a field, let $V$ be a finite-dimensional $k$-vector space and let $S \subseteq \mathrm{End}_k(V)$ be a subset of pairwise commuting (i.e. $\lbrack S, S \rbrack = 0$) endomorphisms. Then the following holds:

  1. If all $f \in S$ are diagonalizable, then there exist maps $\chi_i:S \rightarrow k$, $i=1,\ldots,r$, such that $V = \bigoplus_{i=1}^r E_{\chi_i}(S)$, where $E_\chi(S) := \lbrace v \in V \mid fv = \chi(f)v \ \forall \ f \in S \rbrace$.

  2. The maps $\chi_i$ in 1 are unique.

  3. 1 is equivalent to the existence of a basis $\mathcal{B}$ of $V$ such that for each $f \in S$ the matrix $M_{\mathcal{B}}(f)$ of $f$ with respect to $\mathcal{B}$ is diagonal. (I believe that this might not be true)

  4. If all $f \in S$ are trigonalizable, then there exists a basis $\mathcal{B}$ of $V$ such that for each $f \in S$ the matrix $M_{\mathcal{B}}(f)$ of $f$ with respect to $\mathcal{B}$ is upper triangular and for each diagonalizable $f \in S$ the matrix $M_{\mathcal{B}}(f)$ is diagonal.

I know that a set of commuting diagonalizable endomorphisms can be simultaneously diagonalized in the sense of 3 but I don't know how to prove 1 (my problem is the "glueing" of the $\chi$-maps when I try to prove this by induction on $\mathrm{dim}V$). Also, I know that the first part of 4, the simultaneous trigonalization, holds but I don't know how to show that there exists a basis which then also diagonalizes all diagonalizable endomorphisms. This should follow from 1, I think.

Perhaps, because all this is probably standard stuff, I should mention that this is not a homework problem :)

One additional question: Suppose that $k$ is algebraically closed and that $G$ is an affine commutative algebraic group over $k$ which coincides with its semisimple part, embedded as a closed subgroup in some $GL(V)$. Are the maps $\chi_i:G \rightarrow \mathbb{G}_{m}$ morphisms of algebraic groups?

share|improve this question
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 10 down vote accepted

All of these are true. First note that the space of endomorphisms of $V$ is finite-dimensional, so even an infinite $S$ can just be replaced by finitely many matrices that have the same span (it's really more elegant to think about the span of $S$ as a Lie algebra, rather than $S$ itself). You actually may want to look at some discussion of abelian Lie algebras, since really your question is about the natural structure theorem for semi-simple representations of abelian Lie algebras (if you think in this language question 4) is obvious from the first 3, since any representation has a flag whose successive quotients are semi-simple).

The important point for proving 1) is that if A and B commute and are both diagonalizable, you should analyze the action of B on the eigenspaces of A. The spaces $E_\chi$ above are the eigenspaces of B's action on each eigenspace of A (and if there were a third matrix, you would take the eigenspaces of C acting on the eigenspaces of B in the eigenspaces of A, etc.). 2) is clear, and for 3) just pick any basis of these iterated eigenspaces.

For 3) => 1), you have associated to each basis vector a $\chi$, given by looking at how the elements of $S$ act on it. $E_\chi$ is just the span of all vectors associated to the particular map $\chi$.

For 4), there is a similar argument, but you have to use a flag (the $i$-th subspace being things killed by $(A-\lambda I)^i$ for some scalar $\lambda$) rather than a subspace decomposition. Still, matrices commuting means that B will preserve this flag, so just as one refined the eigenspaces, one can refine this flag.

share|improve this answer
I'm glad that all is true. However, I'm still not able to prove this. For 1: Do you somehow need that $S$ is finite? Because my $S$ might be infinite. For 3: This proves the obvious direction 1=>3, but what about 3=>1? I don't know how to get the chi-maps from a basis consisting of simultaneous eigenvectors. –  user717 Dec 22 '09 at 16:27
3. Is there any restriction on your \chi at all? If not, it's obvious - say your basis of eigenvectors is {e_1,...,e_n}. Then E_i = span{e_i} would work. I don't know how you want to express your chi-maps, but I think \chi_i(f) = the eigenvalue of e_i corresponding to f would be okay. –  Ho Chung Siu Dec 22 '09 at 16:56
1. S could be infinite as long as V is of finite dimension. Just like what Ben has said, you can just look at induced action on eigenspaces. For example, take f in S, and write V = \sum E_i a nontrivial eigenspace decomposition. (assuming that f is not a scalar for now) - If for the rest of the endomorphisms in S, each E_i is an eigenspace, we are done. - If not, WLOG say for g in S, g|E_i is not scalar. Then you break E_1 further into dierct sum of eigenspace of g. This way the number of "components" increases. This number cannot exceed dim V, so this process must stop somehow. –  Ho Chung Siu Dec 22 '09 at 16:56
@Ho Chung Siu: But E_i = span{e_i} is not necessarily of the form E_chi because these do not necessarily have to be one-dimensional!? S={f} with a two-fold eigenvalue would be such a case I think. –  user717 Dec 22 '09 at 17:12
@Arminius So you want the \chi_i in 1 to be all distinct? In that case, look at the \chi_i associated to each e_i. Put all the e_i with the same \chi function together and span these e_i. Then that should work. –  Ho Chung Siu Dec 22 '09 at 17:42
show 2 more comments

And the answer to the additional question (which Ben skipped) is also positive. Indeed, there are two parts here:

  1. $\chi_i$ is a group morphism (this is obvious for any subgroup $G\subset GL(V)$

  2. $\chi_i$ is algebraic (this is obvious because matrix elements of matrices in $GL(V)$ in any basis are algebraic functions for tautological reasons).

share|improve this answer
Why exactly are the chi_i algebraic?? –  user717 Dec 22 '09 at 17:18
Choose a basis such that the first vector is in $E_{\chi_i}$, then $\chi_i$ is the 1-1 matrix element. –  t3suji Dec 22 '09 at 17:32
Oh dear! Thanks. –  user717 Dec 22 '09 at 17:41
add comment

Hi Arminius, For part (1) I believe you're asking that if two diagonalizable matrices commute, then they have the same eigenspaces (aka they are simultaneously diagonalizable). I believe this is true if you make all the eigenvalues distinct:

Let $D$ be diagonal with distinct entries, then if it commutes with $A$:

$AD$ = $DA$

on the LHS of the equation, all the columns of $A$ are scaled by different factors. On the RHS the columns are scaled. The only way to reconcile this is if $A$ is diagonal too.

Hope this helps.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.