Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I have a continuously varying vector field $v(p)$ on $\mathbb{R}^2$, and a particle at point $p$ in the plane that can move in a direction $u(p)$ as long as $u(p)$ is turned at most $\pi/2$ left of $v(p)$. So at any point $p$, the particle can move in a quarter-circle of directions: from $v(p)$ to $v(p)$ rotated $90^\circ$ counterclockwise.

I would like to identify the points in $\mathbb{R}^2$ reachable from a given start point $p_0$ under this constraint. For example, suppose the vector field is determined by a rotation about a fixed center $c$. Then the reachable points are just those in the disk centered on $c$ with radius $|p_0 - c|$:
     Vector Field
I can write down equations, in terms of dot- and cross-product, but they are not revealing to me.

Q. Is there some clean formulation of this problem that suggests a computationally feasible identification of the reachable points?

Thanks for any insights/ideas!

share|improve this question
    
What should your constraint mean at a zero of the vector field? If you don't allow zeros, I'd say you have a Lorentz structure on the plane, and you're asking about the causal relationships between points. –  Ryan Budney Apr 26 '12 at 21:21
    
@Ryan: Good question! I must allow zeros, for rotations about a point are among my vector fields. I guess then $u(p)$ must also be zero: the particle stops and stays there. –  Joseph O'Rourke Apr 26 '12 at 21:31
    
@Ryan: Thanks for the "Lorentz structure" hint; that connection did not occur to me. –  Joseph O'Rourke Apr 26 '12 at 21:34
    
Okay, then you're looking at the causal structure on the plane minus the zeros of the vector field / Lorentz structure. –  Ryan Budney Apr 27 '12 at 6:45
add comment

1 Answer

Sounds like a distribution except that instead of having linear subspaces you have cones. There's this paper: Langerock, "Conic Distributions and Accessible Sets," but it sounds an awful lot like your question (and I wonder if that's where you're starting from in the first place!). It also doesn't say anything about the computability of the accessible set, though they do provide some characterization.

share|improve this answer
    
@fuzzytron: I am starting from a completely different place, but this paper and its references to the literature on accessible sets is just what I need. Thanks! –  Joseph O'Rourke Apr 27 '12 at 11:24
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.