Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose $Y$ is a closed hyperplane in $X$, so we can write $X=Y\oplus[x_0]$. Let $y_n$ be a normalized basis of $Y$. Define an operator $S:Y\to Y\oplus[x_0]$ by $Sy_n=\alpha_ny_n+\beta_nx_0$, for any $n=1,2,\dots$. We can choose $\alpha_n\to 0$ and $\beta_n\to 0$ such that $S$ is compact. Can we find a non-trivial subspace $Z$ of $Y$ such that $S(Z)\subseteq Z$?

Edit: I previously posted a more general question, but I just realized it has a negative answer. This is the concrete example I have.

share|improve this question
    
I don't understand, what if $S(Y) \cap Y =\{0\}$? –  Kevin Beanland Apr 26 '12 at 16:59
    
Yes, the initial question had a negative answer for many reasons. Hopefully the above makes more sense. –  Mathy Apr 26 '12 at 17:02
    
What if you take $Z$:= the closed linear span of some subset of the basis of $Y$ and {$x_0$}? –  Pietro Majer Apr 26 '12 at 17:44
    
@Pietro I want $Z\subseteq Y$. –  Mathy Apr 26 '12 at 17:49

2 Answers 2

If the values $\alpha_n$ are distinct and nonzero and none of the $\beta_n$ is zero, then there is no nontrivial invariant subspace of $Y$. To see this, identify $Y$ with $l^2$, so that $S$ takes the sequence $a = (a_n)$ to $\langle a, \beta\rangle \oplus (\alpha_n a_n) \in {\bf C} \oplus l^2$. Now $Sa \in Y$ if and only if $\langle a,\beta\rangle = 0$, in which case $Sa = 0 \oplus (\alpha_n a_n)$. So we seek a subspace $Z$ of $l^2$ consisting of vectors orthogonal to $\beta$, and which is invariant under multiplication by $\alpha$.

But if $Z$ is invariant under multiplication by $\alpha$, it is also invariant under multiplication by any power of $\alpha$, hence any polynomial in $\alpha$, hence any weak* limit of polynomials in $\alpha$. Assuming the $\alpha_n$ are distinct and nonzero, this means that $Z$ is invariant for all diagonal operators. So $Z$ has to be of the form $l^2(X) \subseteq l^2$ for some set $X \subseteq {\bf N}$. But then if none of the $\beta_n$ are zero, the only way for every vector in $Z$ to be orthogonal to $\beta$ is for $X$ to be empty. So $Z$ has to be the zero subspace.

share|improve this answer
    
The condition "$a_{n}$ nonzero" is not needed. –  jjcale May 11 '12 at 18:30
    
You mean "$\alpha_n$ nonzero". Right. –  Nik Weaver May 11 '12 at 21:39

Consider first a couple of special cases, where there is an obvious choice of $Z:=\operatorname{span}(z)$ with an eigenvctor $z\in Y$.

I. At least one of the $\beta_n$'s vanishes, say $\beta_{n_0}=0$. Then $z:=y_{n_0}$ is an eigenvector of $S$ on $Y$ .

II. At least two of the $\alpha_n$'s coincide, say $\alpha_{n_0}=\alpha_ {n_1}=\lambda$, for $n_0\neq n_1$. Then some non-trivial linear combination $p\beta_{n_0}+q\beta_{n_1}$ vanishes; $z:= p y_{n_0}+qy_{n_1}$ is an eigenvector with eigenvalue $\lambda$.

Conversely, if there is such an invariant subspace $Z\subset Y$, then the compact operator $S_{|Z}$ has an eigenvalue $\lambda$ with eigenvector $z:=\sum_{n=1}^\infty c_ny_n\in Y$. This means $$\sum_{n=1}^\infty \alpha_n c_ny_n + \left(\sum_{n=1}^\infty \beta_nc_n\right)x_0=\lambda \sum_{n=1}^\infty c_ny_n\\ ,$$ so $(\alpha_n-\lambda)c_n=0$ for all $n$ and $\sum_{n=1}^\infty \beta_nc_n=0$. Hence, if only one $c_n$ is non-zero, we are in case I; if there are at least two non-zero $c_n$, we are in case II.

share|improve this answer
    
@Pietro If $Z\subseteq Y$ is invariant, why does $S_{|Z}$ have an eigenvalue? It is possible that it is quasinilpotent and $0$ is not an eigenvalue. –  Mathy Apr 27 '12 at 13:27
    
Oops...there was something fishy indeed. I think I was following a king of circular argument. Deleting! –  Pietro Majer Apr 27 '12 at 17:20

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.