MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space. A P-point in $X$ is a point which does not lie in the boundary of the cozero set of a continuous real-valued function on $X$.

Question. Suppose that $X$ has no isolated points. Is the set of P-points a meagre subset of $X$? Failing this, is the set of non-P-points at least a Baire space?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 5 down vote accepted

The set of non-P-points is a Baire space:

I´ll work with the usual definition of P-point: $p \in X$ is a P-point if the intersection of countably many neighborhoods of $p$ is again a neighborhood of $p$. This is equivalent to the definition in the question for compact $X$.

Fix a compact $X$, let $P \subseteq X$ be the set of all P-points and $N=X \setminus P$. The first thing to notice is that if $A$ is a $G_\delta$ subset of $X$ and $A \subseteq P$ then every $p \in A$ is isolated. This is because (using that $p$ is a P-point and regularity of $X$) there would be a closed (hence compact) neighborhood of $p$ consisting only of P-points. Since compact P-spaces are finite, we get that $p$ is isolated. It follows that if $X$ has no isolated points then $P$ contains no $G_\delta$ and in particular $N$ is dense in $X$.

Now if $\left< U_n : n\in \omega \right>$ is a sequence of open dense subsets of $N$, then each $U_n=V_n \cap N$ for some $V_n$ open in $X$. Since $N$ is dense in $X$ we have that $V_n$ must also be dense in $X$. Then $\bigcap_{n \in \omega}V_n$ is dense in $X$ and since $P$ contains no $G_\delta$, we get that $\bigcap_{n \in \omega}U_n=N \cap \bigcap_{n \in \omega}V_n$ is dense in $N$.

share|cite|improve this answer
Great! Many thanks. – Douglas Somerset Apr 26 '12 at 17:10

The answer to the first half of your question is no, though, at least consistently.

Let $\mathbb{N}^*=\beta \mathbb{N} \setminus \mathbb{N}$ be the remainder of the Stone-Cech compactification of the integers. Under the Continuum Hypothesis, the set of all $P$-points is a dense subset of $\mathbb{N}^*$. But $\mathbb{N}^*$ has no dense meager subset. Indeed, let $\{N_n: n \in \mathbb{N} \}$ be a sequence of nowhere dense sets. Construct a decreasing sequence of open sets $\{U_n: n \in \mathbb{N} \}$ such that $U_n \cap D_n =\emptyset$ and $\overline{U_{n+1}} \subset U_n$ for every $n \in \mathbb{N}$. The set $\bigcap_{n \in \mathbb{N}} \overline{U_n}=\bigcap_{n \in \mathbb{N}} U_n$ is non-empty because of compactness. Moreover, every countable intersection of open subsets of $\mathbb{N}^*$ has non-empty interior (see, for example, Jan van Mill's chapter on $\beta \mathbb{N}$ in the Handbook of Set-theoretic Topology). Thus $Int(\bigcap_{n \in \mathbb{N}} U_n)$ is a non-empty open set missing every $N_n$ and hence $\bigcup_{n\in\mathbb{N}} N_n$ is not dense.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.