Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

When we have a distribuion $u\in \mathcal{D}'(R^n)$,and the restriction to $R^{n}\backslash{0}$ is homogeneous of degree a,we have $u \in \varphi'$ and $\widehat u$ is of degree(-n-a) in $R^{n}\backslash{0}$ .So it's easy to get when $-n< a <0$, $\widehat |x|^a=c_{a,n}|x|^{-n-a}$. my question is what's the result when $a>0$ ?Indeed, it's homogeneous of degree -n-a in$R^n$ and when a=n=1,we have $\widehat|x|=C p.v.|x|^{-2}$,where C is some constant. Futhermore,when we consider the wavefront set,it has the following:if u is a homogeneous distribuion in $R^{n}\backslash{0}$ ,then $(x,\xi) \in WF(u)\Leftrightarrow (\xi,-x) \in WF(\widehat u)$,where $x \neq 0$ , $\xi \neq 0$. Are there other interesting properties related to homogeneous distribuion ?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

In the first place your presentation must be clarified. An homogeneous distribution $u$ of degree $a$ on $\mathbb R^n$ is characterized by $$\forall \lambda >0,\quad u(\lambda x)=\lambda^au(x),\qquad \text{i.e}\quad\langle u(x),\phi(x/\lambda\rangle\lambda^{-n}=\lambda^{a} \langle u(x),\phi(x\rangle, $$ which is also equivalent to the so-called Euler equation $x\cdot\partial_xu=au$. It is not difficult (but not trivial) to prove that an homogeneous distribution on $\mathbb R^n$ is a temperate distribution. Simple examples include in one dimension $pv(1/x)$ (degree $-1$), $H(x)$ (degree $0$), $(x+i0)^a$ (degree $a$), and in $n$ dimensions $\delta_0$ (degree $-n$), $\vert x\vert^a$ for $\Re a>-n$ (degree $a$),$\partial_x^\alpha \vert x\vert^a$ (degree $a-\vert \alpha\vert$). For $a\in \mathbb C$, $$ \frac{x_+^a}{\Gamma(a+1)}\text{is an homogeneous distribution with degree $a$, entire with respect to $a$.} $$

On the other hand, you may consider homogeneous distributions on any cone of $\mathbb R^n$, e.g. on $\mathbb R^n\backslash 0$ and wonder if you can extend these distributions to homogeneous distributions on the whole $\mathbb R^n$. In particular the following result holds: if $u$ is an homogeneous distribution on $\mathbb R^n\backslash 0$ with degree $a$ which is not an integer $\le -n$, then there is a unique extension of $u$ to an homogeneous distribution on the whole $\mathbb R^n$.

Last but not least, if $u$ is an homogeneous distribution of degree $a$ on $\mathbb R^n$, it is temperate and its Fourier transform is indeed homogeneous on $\mathbb R^n$ with degree $-a-n$. In particular, you may consider $\vert x\vert ^a$ which is a radial distribution homogeneous of degree $a$ on $\mathbb R^n\backslash 0$; for $a$ avoiding integer values, it has a unique extension as described above as an homogeneous distribution with degree $a$ on $\mathbb R^n$ and its Fourier transform is also radial and homogeneous with degree $-a-n$, that is coincides with $ c\vert \xi\vert^{-a-n} $ on $\mathbb R^n\backslash 0$.

share|improve this answer
    
@Bzain,thank you very much.your answer is really helpful.consider again $|x|^a$,where a is any positive integer,now we can't use the extension mathod to determine its Fourier transform.indeed, as you have mentioned above,it is coincides with $c|\xi|^{-a-n}$ on $R^n \backslash 0$,but can we write the explicit expression just as the case in one dimension. –  user23078 Apr 26 '12 at 9:00
    
Well if a is an even positive integer, then you get an homogeneous polynomial in $x$ of degree $a$ and its Fourier transform is a linear combination of derivatives of order $a$ of he Dirac mass at 0. When $a$ is an odd positive integer, then the Fourier transform will be indeed radial and homogeneous with degree $-a-n$: you can see that as a sort of finite part with a formula such as $$ \langle\hat u,\phi\rangle=c_{a,n}\int\vert \xi\vert^{-a-n} \bigl(\phi(\xi)-\sum_{0\le j\le N}\phi^{(j)}(0)\xi^j/j!\bigr) \chi(\xi)d\xi $$ –  Bazin Apr 26 '12 at 19:30
    
yes,when a is an even positive integer,the case is easy and seems degenerate. i wanna understand in your last formula,is $\chi(\xi)$ standing for any cut-off funtion which vanish at 0 ? I'm really appreciated that if you can show me some references about this question.. –  user23078 Apr 27 '12 at 2:55
    
To Huang Shanlin: the function $\chi$ is smooth with compact support and is 1 near 0, in such a way that you may add (I should have done this, but I wanted to insist on the way to get rid of the singularity) on the rhs of the above equality $$ \int\vert \xi\vert^{-a-n}\phi(\xi)(1-\chi(\xi)) d\xi. $$ Best, Bazin. –  Bazin Apr 30 '12 at 19:17
    
@Bazin,I found myself not completely understand it yet,I think your definition of $\hat u$ is not unique,since it depends on the choice of $ \chi(\xi)$.so what's the problem behind this ? thanks in advance –  user23078 Jun 20 '12 at 8:50
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.