## $\pi_0${plane fields}$\to\mathbb{Z}_2$

On a 3-manifold $Y$, oriented 2-plane fields $\xi$ are oriented rank-2 subbundles of $TY$. Denote the set of such (up to homotopy) by $\Theta=\pi_0\lbrace\xi\rbrace$. What is an explicit canonical map $\Theta\to\mathbb{Z}_2$ ?

In particular, I want to see the canonical mod-2 grading on Seiberg-Witten-Floer Homology, but the classical text of Kronheimer-Mrowka doesn't mention it in terms of 2-plane fields. They construct an isomorphism of $\Theta$ with some abstract set $\mathbb{J}$ based upon "configuration points" $[a]$, and then a canonical map $\mathbb{J}\to\mathbb{Z}_2$ by assigning to $[a]$ an operator and taking its index mod-2. These two maps are tough enough on their own, so I cannot see what it looks like on 2-plane fields... Plus, there should be some purely topological partition of $\Theta$ into two subsets.

Otherwise, perhaps it can be done knowing that oriented 2-plane fields are equivalent to 1-forms of length 1, and are also equivalent to pairs $(\mathfrak{s},\phi)$ where $\mathbb{s}$ is a spin-c structure and $\phi$ is a unit-length spinor. This should then be related to taking a 4-manifold $X$ such that $\partial X=Y$ and with a spin-c structure $\mathfrak{s}_X$ which extends $\mathfrak{s}$.

-
I may be guessing incorrectly, but what is wrong with taking the subbundle orthgonal $L$ to $\xi$ (after putting a metric on $Y$). To every (isomorphism class of) line bundle on $Y$ we have its oriantation; send $L$ to $\mathbb{Z}_2$ via its orientation. – Somnath Basu Apr 19 2012 at 22:00
It's not canonical. – Chris Gerig Apr 19 2012 at 22:41
See Kronheimer-Mrowka-Ozsvath-Szabo, "Monopoles and lens space surgeries", section 2.5. – Tim Perutz Apr 20 2012 at 5:10
Perfect! But doesn't this just provide the existence of such a map? I could see trying to construct a map from this, by taking $X$ such that $\partial X=Y$ and then removing a ball from it to get a cobordism $W:Y\to S^3$, giving a parity-relation between $\Theta(Y)$ and $\Theta(S^3)$ via that cobordism index'' $\iota(W)$, but then we had to a priori decide on $\Theta(S^3)\to\mathbb{Z}_2$. – Chris Gerig Apr 20 2012 at 6:23
@Somanth Basu: Isn't what you construct always zero? We're looking at oriented 2-plane fields on an oriented manifold, so the orthogonal complement (which is canonical) will also be oriented. – Dylan Thurston Apr 30 2012 at 18:28
show 4 more comments

## 1 Answer

In light of the paper referenced in Tim Perutz' comment, I believe to have written down a desired map:

An oriented 2-plane field $\xi$ is equivalent to a pair $(\mathfrak{s},\phi)$ on $Y$, where $\mathfrak{s}$ is a spin-c structure and $\phi$ is unit-length spinor. By Proposition 28.1.2 (of Kronheimer-Mrowka's textbook), there exists an oriented 4-manifold $X$ with $\partial X=Y$ and carrying a spin-c structure $\mathfrak{s}_X=(S^+,\rho_X)$ which extends $\mathfrak{s}$, i.e. $\mathfrak{s}\cong(S^+|_Y,\rho_Y)$. Now the relative Euler class $e(S^+,\phi)$ satisfies $e(S^+,\phi)[X,\partial X]$ = $gr_z(X,\mathfrak{s}_X,[a])\in\mathbb{Z}$ for some configuration point $[a]$ associated to $\phi$, and this index is independent of $z$. And by Proposition 28.2.2, this is independent of the choice of $X$ (up to homotopy of $\phi$). This is where the isomorphism $\mathbb{J}(Y)\cong \Theta(Y)$, $\xi\leftrightarrow [a]$, comes from. We can thus write down a map $f:\Theta(Y)\to\mathbb{Z}_2$ via $\xi\mapsto e(S^+,\phi)[X,\partial X]\;\text{mod}2$.
However, when we apply this to $Y=S^3$ we get the flipped even/odd decomposition of $\widehat{HM}(S^3)$. Thus we can simply change our $f$ by $Aut(\mathbb{Z}_2)$, i.e. adding a $1$, to get agreement.

I would still be interested in other maps which don't necessarily apply to SW-Floer theory.

-