Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $f\colon\thinspace M\to N$ be a map of closed smooth manifolds, with $\dim M > \dim N$. Recall that a submersion is a smooth map whose differential is surjective at every point in the domain.

Can one give conditions which guarantee that $f$ is homotopic to an submersion?

These conditions would necessarily have to be homotopy invariants. I am thinking there may be something in terms of relations amongst characteristic classes.

I am aware of the theorem of Phillips

MR0208611 (34 #8420) Phillips, Anthony Submersions of open manifolds. Topology 6 1967 171–206.

which says roughly that, when $M$ is open, $f\colon\thinspace M\to N$ is homotopic to an immersion if and only if the differential $df\colon\thinspace TM\to TN$ is homotopic to a bundle epimorphism. I'm also aware of the subsequent work of Thomas

MR0225332 (37 #926) Thomas, Emery On the existence of immersions and submersions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 132 1968 387–394.

giving applications of Phillips' theorem. However, I couldn't find any more modern references dealing with the case $M$ closed. Are there any, or is there a good heuristic reason why such conditions cannot be given?

Remark: By Ehresmann's Theorem, and since $M$ is compact, it is equivalent to ask whether $f$ is homotopic to the projection of a locally trivial fibration.

share|improve this question

2 Answers 2

up vote 5 down vote accepted

Let $F$ be the homotopy fibre of $f$ (ie the space of pairs $(x,u)$, where $x\in M$ and $u$ is a path from $f(x)$ to a specified baspoint in $N$). If $f$ is homotopic to a submersion $f'$, then (using Ehresmann) $F$ will be homotopy equivalent to a closed manifold $(f')^{-1}\{\text{point}\}$, and in particular, it will be equivalent to a finite CW complex. I do not know whether the converse is also true, but I suspect that any counterexamples would be quite exotic. So the first thing to do is to try to estimate the size of $F$.

Let $k$ be a field, and take cohomology with coefficients in $k$. At least is $N$ is simply connected, there is an Eilenberg-Moore spectral sequence $\text{Tor}_{H^*N}(H^*M,k)\Rightarrow H^*F$, where $F$ is the homotopy fibre. If $H^*M$ is a free module over $H^*N$ then this collapses to an isomorphism $H^*F=H^*M\otimes_{H^*N}k$, and this will be a finite-dimensional $k$-algebra. I think it will also automatically have Poincare duality (provided that $M$ and $N$ are oriented). If $H^*M$ is not free over $H^*N$ then the $E_2$ page will typically be very large, and in some cases it may be possible to show that no possible pattern of differentials will leave a finite-dimensional $E_\infty$ page. If so, we can conclude that $f$ is not homotopic to a submersion.

Alternatively, if $f$ is homotopic to a submersion then the tangent bundle $\tau_M$ maps surjectively to $f^*(\tau_N)$, which implies that the Stiefel-Whitney polynomial $w(\tau_M,t)=\sum_iw_i(\tau_M)t^{\dim(M)-i}$ is divisible by $f^*w(\tau_N,t)$ in $H^*(M;\mathbb{Z}/2)[t]$. This should generally be easy to check. There is a similar criterion with Chern polynomials of the complexified tangent bundles in integral cohomology.

share|improve this answer
@Neil: Thanks, the necessary condition involving SW-classes should be useful. –  Mark Grant Apr 13 '12 at 19:06
@Neil: "This should generally be easy to check": sorry to be dense, but could you offer me some more help here? I have my two polys $f,g\in R[t]$, where $R=H^\ast(M;\mathbb{Z}/2)$. But $R$ is not an integral domain. Are there any tips and tricks for deciding whether $f$ divides $g$ in this case? Or just brute force? –  Mark Grant Apr 17 '12 at 10:20
BTW, the manifold maps I am looking at are axial maps $\mathbb{R}P^n\times \mathbb{R}P^n\to \mathbb{R}P^r$ (so $n<r$ and the restriction to each factor is homotopic to the standard inclusion). Hence $R\cong\mathbb{Z}/2[a,b]/(a^{n+1},b^{n+1})$. –  Mark Grant Apr 17 '12 at 10:22
@Mark: the polynomials in question are monic, so you can just do the standard algorithm for long division and see if you are left with a remainder. This is straightforward in any particular case, but not necessarily for an infinite family of cases. In the case you mention we have $f(t)=(t+a+b)^{r+1}/t$ and $g(t)=(t+a)^{n+1}(t+b)^{n+1}/t^2$. The question of whether $f$ divides $g$ probably depends in a sensitive way on the binary expansions of $r+1$ and $n+1$. You could easily get Maple etc to calculate a few hundred cases, and a pattern would probably emerge. –  Neil Strickland Apr 17 '12 at 11:03
@Neil: Good idea, thanks! –  Mark Grant Apr 17 '12 at 11:53

Phillips theorem is plainly wrong in the compact case, and for fairly non subtle reasons.

Take a closed oriented $3$-manifold $M$. There are plenty of bundle epimorphisms $TM \to \mathbb{R}$ because $M$ is parallelizable; any form without zeroes gives you one. Now very often the kernel is a trivial vector bundle as well, so all possible characteristic classes I can think of are null. However, $f$ is never homotopic to a submersion since $\mathbb{R}$ is not compact.

The truth is that the fact that the immersion theorem holds for closed manifolds is an accident. Other cases of Gromov's h-principle (metric with signed curvature, symplectic structures) show that the h-principle fails completely in the closed case. This is not to say that there are no h-principles for closed manifolds, but definitely not for submersions.

share|improve this answer
@Johannes: Thanks. Are there such simple counter-examples in the case when $N$ is also compact? For instance, replacing $\mathbb{R}$ by $S^1$, a map $M\to S^1$ is a class in $H^1(M;\mathbb{Z})$. Can we decide if this class contains a submersion? –  Mark Grant Apr 13 '12 at 9:06
@Mark: As I learnt from W. Steimle recently, it is a theorem of Browder--Levine, Farell, and Siebenmann that a map $f : M \to S^1$ is homotopic to a fibre bundle projection if and only if i) its homotopy fibre has the homotopy type of a finite CW complex, and ii) a certain torsion invariant $\tau \in Wh(\pi_1(M))$ vanishes. The torsion invariant is the Whitehead torsion of the $h$-cobordism one gets by splitting $M$ open over a regular value of $f$. –  Oscar Randal-Williams Apr 13 '12 at 9:33
And of course $M$ must have dimension $\geq 6$. –  Oscar Randal-Williams Apr 13 '12 at 9:33
@Oscar: Thanks for pointing out these references, in particular the work of Steimle and his collaborators seems to address my more general question. –  Mark Grant Apr 13 '12 at 19:05
The predecessor of the Browder-Levine theorem is Stallings Fibration Theorem which holds for a closed 3-manifold $M$ which is irreducible. The statement is that $f:M->S^1$ is homotopic to a fiber bundle projection if and only if $f_*:\pi_1(M)\to\pi_1(S^1)$ is surjective and has finitely generated kernel. –  Lee Mosher Apr 14 '12 at 13:57

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.