Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Assume $X$ is a measure space and $f : X \to [0,\infty]$ is an absolutely integrable function (that is $\int_X f \; d \mu < \infty$). This question is about the asymptotic behaviour of the function $$E(\delta) = \int _{f \leq \delta} f \; d \mu.$$

Since $f$ is absolutely integrable, it follows from the downward monotone convergence theorem that $E(\delta) \to 0$ as $\delta \to 0$. What I want to understand is how fast $E(\delta)$ converges to 0.

What I know is that if $\mu(X) < \infty$ then we have $E(\delta) \leq \delta \mu(X)$, so $E(\delta)$ converges to $0$ at a linear rate or faster.

Question: What can be said when $\mu(X) = \infty$?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 3 down vote accepted

You can't say anything in general. For a simple example showing that you can't get any polynomial rate, consider the measure space $X = [1, \infty)$ with the Lebesgue measure and the function $f(x) = x^{-(1 + \epsilon)}$. Assuming I integrated it correctly, you get $E(\delta) = \frac{1}{\epsilon} \delta^{\epsilon/(1 + \epsilon)}$ which gets arbitrarily slow as $\epsilon \to 0$.

You can also do a more complicated construction that gives a bit more: for any function $e(\delta)$ with $e(\delta) \to 0$, you can find an $f$ such that $E(\delta_k) \ge e(\delta_k)$ for some sequence $\delta_k \to 0$. In particular, you can get arbitrarily slow rates. For this construction, choose a decreasing sequence $\delta_k \to 0$ with $e(\delta_k) \le 2^{-k}$. Then define $f$ such that $\mu(f = \delta_k) = 2^{-k}/\delta_k$. (If $X$ is $[0, \infty)$ with Lebesgue measure, you can do this by setting $f(x) = \delta_k$ if $\sum_{j \le k-1} 2^{-j}/\delta_j \le x < \sum_{j \le k} 2^{-j}/\delta_j$.) Then $f$ is integrable because $$ \int f = \sum_{k} \delta_k \mu(f = \delta_k) = \sum_k 2^{-k} < \infty. $$ But you have $$ E(\delta_k) = \int_{f \le \delta_k} f = \sum_{j \ge k} \delta_j \mu(f = \delta_j) \ge \delta_k \mu(f = \delta_k) = 2^{-k} = e(\delta_k). $$

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.