If $A$ is a Cohen Macaulay local ring, and $B$ is a quotient ring of $A$ and $B$ is also Cohen Macaulay, Then is $B$ always a quotient by a regular sequence of $A$?
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
Here is an even better example:
Geometrically, $B$ corresponds to a line going through the vertex of a quadric cone corresponding to $A$. It is not a quotient by a regular sequence, because that would have to be just a regular element for dimension reasons, but the line is not a Cartier divisor, so it cannot be defined by a single equation. To see that it is not a Cartier divisor, for example one can compute its self-intersection number which is $\frac 12$. |
|||
|
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
1
|
A more general series of examples (when this fails) is given by choosing $B$ to be Cohen-Macaulay, but not Gorenstein and $A$ to be Gorenstein. An explicit example is when |
|||
|
|
|
4
|
As another example, say $\mathfrak{m}$ is the maximal ideal of $A$. Then $B:=A/\mathfrak{m}$ is Cohen-Macaulay (field), but $\mathfrak{m}$ is not generated by a regular sequence, unless $A$ is regular. |
||
|
|
|
6
|
The answer is no. Let $k$ be a field. Let $A=k[x]/x^2$, and let $B=k$. $A$ is Artinian, so it is Cohen Macaulay. $B$ is clearly Cohen Macaulay. But the only non-trivial ideal in $A$ is $(x)$ which is not generated by a regular sequence, because every element of it is a zero-divisor. |
||
|
|

