Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $L_E$ denote Bousfield localisation with repsect to the cohomology theory $E$. I am trying to follow through some calculations in Hovey-Strickland's paper Morava $K$-theories and localisation

Claim 7.10(e) is that

$$L_{K(n)}X = \underset{\leftarrow}{\text{holim}}_I L_{E(n)}X \wedge S/I$$

where the homotopy limit is over a tower of generalised Moore spectra (the Moore spectra $S/I$ is defined in 4.12 and the tower in 4.22)

Define $$E_*^{\vee}:=\pi_{*} (L_{K(n)} (E \wedge X))$$

the $K(n)$-local version of Morava $E$-theory (where, I believe, Morava $E$-theory here is what I might call a completed Johnson-Wilson theory, but I don't believe it really matters).

The claim (8.04) is then that we can extract a Milnor exact sequence from this:

$$0 \to \varprojlim_I {}^1 (E/I)_{\ast+1}(X) \to E_*^\vee X \to \varprojlim_I (E/I)_*X \to 0 $$

I'm not sure how to show this. I would like to think that we can get a sequence

$$0 \to \varprojlim_I {}^1 \pi_{\ast+1}(L_{E(n)}(E \wedge X) \wedge S/I)\to E_{\ast}^\vee X \to \varprojlim_I \hspace{1mm} \pi_* (L_{E(n)}(E \wedge X) \wedge S/I) \to 0 $$

and then if you drop the $E(n)$-localisation it seems to work, but I'm not really sure about this.

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 9 down vote accepted

In this case, this follows because $E(n)$-localization is a smashing localization. Specifically, $$ L_{E(n)}(X) = L_{E(n)}(\mathbb{S}) \wedge X $$ for any $X$. In particular, this means that the smash product of any spectrum with an $E(n)$-local spectrum is already $E(n)$-local.

The fact that $E(n)$-localization is smashing was one of the Ravenel conjectures; specifically, conjecture 10.6 in his paper "Localization with respect to certain periodic homology theories". I don't have a copy of his orange book handy and so can't give you a reference for the theorem statement.

As a result, as the Morava $E$-theories are $E(n)$-local already, so are the smash products $E \wedge X$ in your equation.

share|improve this answer
3  
Thanks Tyler! In its simplest form: $L_{E(n)}(E \wedge X) = L_{E(n)}(\mathbb{S}) \wedge E \wedge X = L_{E(n)} (E) \wedge X = E \wedge X$? –  Drew Heard Mar 30 '12 at 2:11
    
Drew, exactly right. –  Tyler Lawson Mar 30 '12 at 2:45
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.