MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

The $Z_2$-homology of a surface viewed as a simplicial complex allows us to extract interesting invariants from the resulting homology groups. $\beta_0$ is the number of connected components, $\beta_1$ is the number of "tunnels" and $\beta_2$ is the number of "cavities" ($\beta_i$, the $i^{th}$ Betti number, being the rank of the $i^{th}$ homology group)

Are there other "interesting" invariants of surfaces (or even graphs) that can be obtained by going from $Z_2$ to some other field (like the rationals), or are all of these equivalent in some sense ?

share|cite|improve this question
The number of connected components can be detected by the rank of the zeroeth homology group with any coefficient. Once you assume that everything is connected, there is only $H_1$ and $H_2$. In general, the Betti numbers are, by definition, the ranks of the cohomology groups which may or may not be the same as the ranks of the homology groups. Moreover, there is a (classical) complete classification for connected surfaces - the no. of cavities, the genus, and the orientability. – Somnath Basu Mar 30 '12 at 2:51

The integrall homology determines the homology with any coefficients.

share|cite|improve this answer
So you're saying that they are all equivalent ? – Suresh Venkat Mar 30 '12 at 2:10
I am saying that if you know the homology with integral coefficients, then you can determine the homology with coefficients is any other Abelian group. If you know the homology with coefficients in say $\mathbb{Q}$ then you cannot determine the integral homology. – Liviu Nicolaescu Mar 30 '12 at 9:45

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.