Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $X$ be a Banach space and let $T$ be a bounded operator acting on $X$. Suppose for each linearly independent unbounded sequence $(x_n)$ in $E$, the sequence $(Tx_n)$ is unbounded. Must $T$ be automatically Fredholm? (it has of course finitie-dimensional kernel).

EDIT: Matthew's answer 'no' is sufficient to me.

EDIT2: This question might be deleted.

share|improve this question
    
The second question is answered "no": $T$ could be a non-Fredholm isometry, for example. –  Matthew Daws Mar 29 '12 at 19:04

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

We can assume WLOG $X$ is infinite-dimensional. Since $\text{Ker}(T)$ is finite-dimensional, $\text{Ran}(T)$ is infinite-dimensional. I claim there is $C > 0$ such that for every $x \in X$, $\|Tx\| \ge C \|x\|$. If not, there a sequence $x_n \in X$ with $\|x_n\| = n$ and $\|Tx_n\| < 1/n$. If necessary perturbing the $x_n$ slightly, we can assume $x_n$ are linearly independent, and this will contradict your condition.

Now this implies that $T$ is one-to-one, and that $\text{Ran}(T)$ is closed (because if $T x_n$ converges, $x_n$ is Cauchy and thus converges, and $\lim Tx_n = T(\lim x_n)$). However, $T$ is not necessarily Fredholm: it could be an isomorphism onto a closed proper subspace of $X$.

share|improve this answer

Not sure about this, but I think this has something to do with the compactness of T? In any case, T is not necessarily a Fredholm operator.

share|improve this answer
    
I would have entered this as a comment if I could have, as I am not sure enough about it to make it an answer, but I am unable to comment. Oh well, good luck with this question! –  Jodens Potends Mar 29 '12 at 20:17

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.