MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $P(x_1, \ldots , x_n)$ be a homogeneous polynomials over a finite field with $q$ elements. Is there any way to count all the roots of $P$?

share|cite|improve this question
Yes, see, but in what form are you seeking an answer? – Charles Matthews Mar 28 '12 at 18:33
I look forms that are linear for all variables. For example to calculate the uember of matrices n-by-n with zero determinant in a finite field. This leads to calculate the zero of a form. In the case of the determinant is is easy. – miguel Mar 29 '12 at 15:05
What you asked is certainly understandable, but it would have been nice if p hadn't been used to denote both the polynomial and the characteristic of the field. – KConrad Mar 30 '12 at 3:38

This is really a comment on Igor Rivin's answer (I don't have enough rep. to comment, it seems), but one has to be attentive to whether or not the polynomial $p$ (not to be confused with the prime $p$...) is absolutely irreducible over the ground field, or at least whether its irreducible factors are absolutely irreducible. In general the answer is influenced by the degrees of the finite extensions of the ground field over which the various "geometric" irreducible factors of $p$ are defined. Lang and Weil would have known how to formulate this, though in modern terms it comes out from how the structure of the top-degree compactly supported etale cohomology is influenced by the "field of definition" (or field of constants in the function fields) of the various irreducible components.

share|cite|improve this answer

The magic words are: Lang-Weil

share|cite|improve this answer
Thanks, helped me a lot – miguel Mar 29 '12 at 14:54
L-W had helped me a lot in the past (your example of determinant is a very good example of a case where it is very convenient). – Igor Rivin Mar 29 '12 at 15:21

This is a big field and improvements are being made all the time. The key phrases to search on are "zeta function" and "hypersurface" -- the $\zeta$-function of $F=0$ is $\exp(\sum \frac{N_n}{n} t^n )$ where $N_n$ is the number of solutions to $F=0$ over $\mathbb{F}_{p^n}$.

I started learning the current approaches from Kedlaya's lecture notes (and consider myself far from fully understanding them). A quick mathscinet search suggests that the state of the art is this paper for smooth $F$. I don't know whether these are at your level or way too hard, but they might give you a sense for the sort of thing people are thinking about.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you. I am reading this paper – miguel Mar 29 '12 at 14:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.