## Inverting convolution

I have a relation of the form $$\omega = f\ast \mu \qquad (1)$$ where $\omega$ and $\mu$ are distributions in $\mathcal {D}'(\mathbb{R})$ and $$f(x) = H(x-1)(x^2 - 1)^{1/2}x$$ with $H(x) = 1_{\mathbb{R}_+}$ denoting the Heaviside function.

My goal is to show that $\mathrm{WF}_a (\omega ) = \mathrm{WF}_a (\mu )$ where $\mathrm{WF}_a$ is the analytical wave front set, and for this I would like to invert (1), i.e. solve it for $\mu$. By taking Fourier transforms I get $$\mu = C \widehat {\Big (\frac{1}{\hat {f}}\Big)} \ast \omega$$ for some constant C. Here I would thus like to conclude that if $\omega$ extends to a holomorphic function near some $x\in \mathbb{R}$ then the same goes for $\mu$.

My problem is I have no clue what the transform of $1/\hat{f}$ is.

EDIT: I have changed from $H(x)$ to $H(x-1)$ in the definition of $f$.

-
According to Maple $\hat{f}=C\frac{K_1(i\xi )}{\xi }$ where $K_1$ is a modified Bessel function. I think $K_1(i\xi ) = C_0H_1^{(1)}(-\xi )$ where $H_1^{(1)}$ is a Hankel function. Thus I'm interested in analytic extensions of the transform of $\frac{\xi }{H_1^{(1)}(-\xi )}$. – Alex A Mar 28 2012 at 9:58
The question posed is to determine the Fourier transform of a specific distribution and not inverting convolution as your title suggests. BTW, you don't need to invert the convolution to show equality of WF sets. Since the dominant term of the $\hat{f}$ is a constant and it is multiplying the fourier transform of $\mu$, we should be able to say that the WFs are same, irrespective of we know $\mu$ or not. – Uday Mar 28 2012 at 10:52