2

I think this SE site is the best fit for this question, if not please direct me somewhere else :).

For my Bsc. Thesis I've researched algorithms to determine the number of upper sets in a partially ordered set. Before I started, me and my professor searched for any prior research, unfortunately we couldn't find much except for research regarding the Dedekind number which is partially related.

While I'm finishing up my thesis my professor has expressed the wish to look for related work again to at least have some references and a half-decent 'prior/related work' chapter. So I'm looking for anything that is slightly related. However I keep running head first into pay-walls every time I find something that might be slightly related and I have a difficult time to asses the value of a paper based on it's front cover or the abstract. Of course my University has some contracts with some of these pay-walls but only mere luck directs me to one of these sometimes.

I'm looking for tips on where to find any related material concerning upper sets and upwards closure and if someone has experience and tips on writing a thesis in a field where there is not much prior work to cite from.

flag

1 Answer

6

J.S. Provan and M.O. Ball, The complexity of counting cuts and of computing the probability that a graph is connected, SIAM J. Comput. 12 (1983) 777-78, show that the problem of computing the number of upper sets (often called dual order ideals or filters) is #P-complete. For some special posets the number of upper sets (or equivalently, lower sets aka order ideals) can be computed explicitly. Some examples appear in Enumerative Combinatorics, vol.1, 2nd ed., especially in the exercises to Chapter 3. See http://math.mit.edu/~rstan/ec/ec1. Some of the relevant exercises are 3.62, 3.66, 3.68, 3.74, 3.149, 3.170, 3.172. These last two are the deepest and most interesting.

link|flag
Hey Richard, that's quite a catch. I hadn't found before that this problem is #P-Complete and I don't think my professor knew as well. This is a great reference and a good way to compare the speed of my algorithm. I'll also take a look at the exercises when I get back from work. One more question though. How did you find this information? Or did you just knew it? – royalexander Mar 26 2012 at 6:30
Roy, I already knew the #P-complete result, but I found the reference by a google search on "order ideal #P-complete". – Richard Stanley Mar 26 2012 at 23:35
2 
It also appears your link is broken but I think it's math.mit.edu/~rstan/ec/ec1.pdf :) – royalexander Mar 31 2012 at 16:06

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.