Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

The canonical rational form helps us to parametrize the conjugacy classes in $GL(n)$ over any commutative field.

How can we parametriize the conjugacy classes in $SL_n(k)$, where $k$ is an arbitrary locally compact field or a global field?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer 1

up vote 4 down vote accepted

The results in Section 3 of my joint paper with John Britnell are relevant. They give a complete parametrization if $k$ is a finite field.

Let $g \in GL_n(k)$ be an element with rational canonical form labelled by $f_1^{\lambda_1} \ldots f_r^{\lambda_r}$ where the $f_i \in k[x]$ are irreducible polynomials, and the $\lambda_i$ are partitions. We define the part-size invariant of $g$ to be the highest common factor of all the parts of the partitions $\lambda_1, \ldots, \lambda_r$.

Suppose that $g \in SL_n(k)$ has part-size invariant $m$. Then by Proposition 3.10 in the paper (which is stated for finite fields, but holds more generally) the determinant of any matrix in $\mathrm{Cent}_{GL_n(k)}(g)$ is an $m$th power. If the subgroup of $k^\times$ generated by $m$th powers has index $t$ in $k^\times$ then $g^{GL_n(k)}$ is the union of at least $t$ conjugacy classes of $SL_n(k)$.

If $k = \mathbb{F}_q$ then $t = \mathrm{hcf}(m,q-1)$ and, by Corollary 3.2 in the paper, $g^{GL_n(\mathbb{F}_q)}$ splits into exactly $t$ conjugacy classes of $SL_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$. If the determinant of $x \in GL_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ is a generator of $\mathbb{F}_q^\times$, then the conjugates of $g$ by $1,x,\ldots,x^{t-1}$ are a set of representatives for the conjugacy classes of $SL_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ contained in $g^{GL_n(q)}$. It follows that the conjugacy classes of $SL_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ are parametrized by pairs

$$(f_1^{\lambda_1} \ldots f_r^{\lambda_r}, i)$$

where $f_1^{\lambda_1} \ldots f_r^{\lambda_r}$ is the label of a rational canonical form of a conjugacy class of $GL_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ contained in $SL_n(\mathbb{F}_q)$ and $0 \le i < \mathrm{hcf}(m,q-1)$ where $m$ is the corresponding part-size invariant.

In general I think this question quickly leads to difficult arithmetic problems. To take one very special case, if $\gamma \in \mathbb{Q}$ and

$$g = \left( \begin{matrix} 0 & -1 \newline 1 & \gamma \end{matrix} \right) \in SL_2(\mathbb{Q}),$$

then there is a matrix commuting with $g$ of determinant $d$ if and only if $d = a^2 + ab\gamma + b^2$ for some $a,b \in \mathbb{Q}$. Hence $g^{GL_n(\mathbb{Q})}$ splits into $s$ classes of $SL_n(\mathbb{Q})$ where $s$ is the index in $\mathbb{Q}^\times$ of the subgroup of $\mathbb{Q}^\times$ consisting of all elements of the form $a^2 + ab\gamma + b^2$.

share|improve this answer
1  
This is very helpful as a first indication of the complications, which arise in this problem. Since I am primarly interested in conjugacy over local and global fields, I have changed the question a little bit, but I accept yours. Thanks. –  plusepsilon.de Mar 21 '12 at 15:16
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.