Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

I've been told once or twice that the following holds:

There is a model of $ZFC+MA+\neg CH$ in which there is a $\mathfrak{c}$-universal linear order embedded in $(\omega^\omega, \le^\ast)$

Moreover, several people have attributed the construction of such a model to Hugh Woodin. The context that seems the most natural for this construction to appear is in his work on automatic-continuity, however for the life of me, I can't seem to find it.

It might also be the case that the embedding is into $\mathcal{P}(\omega)/fin$.

Does anybody know of a reference for this? Or if Woodin did indeed construct it (I only ask because my searches have yielded little fruit)?

Edit:

In this context a $\mathfrak{c}$-universal linear order $(L, \prec)$ has the following property: $\vert L \vert \le \mathfrak{c}$ and for every linear order $(\ell, <) $, with $\vert \ell \vert \le \mathfrak{c}$ there is an embedding $\varphi_\ell:\ell \rightarrow L$ respecting the linear order of $\ell$.


Thought I should share what I can find/know:

So far I've been able to find models for the following

$ZFC+ \neg CH$ and there is such a $\mathfrak{c}$-universal linear order in $(\omega^\omega,\le^\ast)$.

This is due to Laver, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0049237X08716306

In addition, there is also

$ZFC+MA+\neg CH$ and no such order is embedded in $(\omega^\omega,\le^\ast)$

There seem to be several models for this one, Laver cites two, one from Solovay and one from Kunen. I can only assume the Solovay model is the same constructed in Theorem 5.7 (p. 201, "Hausdroff Gaps and Limits", by Frankiewicz and Zbierski)

In addition there is

$CH\implies $ $(\omega^\omega,\le^\ast)$ contains a $\mathfrak{c}$-universal linear order

Which should be contained in (or atleast hinted at in) "Model Theory", by Chang and Keisler. If not there, the lack of $(\omega,\omega)$-gaps in $(\omega^\omega,\le^\ast)$ should produce it rather quickly.

So yeah, it would seem that the only link missing in this puzzle is the one I can't find the reference for.

share|improve this question
    
Of course $(\omega^\omega, \leq ^ \ast)$ is never a linear order. I guess you meant to say that under $CH$ it contains a $\mathfrak{c}$-universal linear order. –  Ramiro de la Vega Mar 14 '12 at 13:52
    
Yes, of course! Thank you. –  Michael Blackmon Mar 14 '12 at 13:59

2 Answers 2

You may want to have a look at this paper (PDF) by Baumgartner, Frankiewicz and Zbierski; it establishes the consistency of $\mathrm{MA}_{\sigma\text{-linked}}+\neg\mathrm{CH}$ plus ``every Boolean algebra of size at most $\mathfrak{c}$ is embeddable into $\mathcal{P}(\omega)/\mathit{fin}$''. The method is like that of Laver's, building a universal algebra inside $\mathcal{P}(\omega)/\mathit{fin}$ at the even stages of the iteration and getting Martin's Axiom for $\sigma$-linked posets at the even stages.

share|improve this answer

Francisco Kibedi has written down a version of this for the $c$ universal linear order consistent with MA for $\sigma$ linked partial orders. His thesis is concerned with maximal such linear orders in the sense of Hausdorff's pantachies.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.