4
$\begingroup$

If $0< a_1\le a_2\le \cdots \le a_n\le a_{n+1}$ and $p>1$, is it true that $$\left(\frac{n+1}{n}\right)^{1-\frac{1}{p}}\left(\frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}a_i^p}{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i^p}\right)^{\frac{1}{p}}\ge \frac{\sum_{i=1}^{n+1}a_i}{\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_i}?$$ The numerator and denominator looks like Hölder's inequality.

$\endgroup$
2
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Can you tell us why you suspect this? $\endgroup$ Mar 10, 2012 at 21:55
  • $\begingroup$ If it is true, then I have something to say, but.... $\endgroup$
    – Russel
    Mar 10, 2012 at 22:36

1 Answer 1

10
$\begingroup$

It's not true. Your proposed inequality can be thought of as saying that the quotient

$(L^p\text{-average of }a_1,\ldots,a_n)/(L^1\text{-average of }a_1,\ldots,a_n)$

is nondecreasing in $n$. If this were true for large $p$ then it would be true for $p=\infty$, which would say that

$a_n/(L^1\text{-average of }a_1,\ldots,a_n)$

is nondecreasing in $n$. But this is clearly false. Just take $a_{n+1}=a_n$: the numerator stays the same but the denominator increases.

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Clever argument. $\endgroup$
    – Russel
    Mar 10, 2012 at 22:36
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ For example, $a_1 = 1$, $a_2 = a_3 = p = 100$ works. $\endgroup$
    – Woett
    Mar 11, 2012 at 14:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.