Dehn's theorem states that any simplicial strictly convex polyedron P in Euclidean 3space is infinitesimally rigid (that is, any nontrivial first order deformation of P induces a variation of its edges lengths). But many authors write « convex polyhedra are infinitesimally rigid »... Are the conditions « simplicial » and « strictly » necessary ?
Take the 2minute tour
×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.
The way the Alexandrov phrases the theorem, in his book Convex Polyhedra (p.421) is:
When the polyhedron is simplicial, i.e., all faces are triangles, then all faces are infinitesimally rigid. The 1skeleton of a cube is not rigid, because the squares can deform to rhombi. But if the cube faces are rigid squares, then this nonsimplicial polyhedron is rigid. So it depends on what you consider a polyhedron—Is it built out of sticks or out of plates? I am not sure what is meant by a non«strictly convex polyhedron». [Igor clarifies below.] 

