MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top


I want to take a unit $n$-ball $B_n$ and quotient it by some subgroup $G \subset \mathbb{Z}_2^n$.

Here is a sketch of the construction: take the obvious inscribed $n$-hypercube of $B_n$; we can associate the hypercube's vertices with the $2^n$ bitstrings of length $n$, and take some sub-vector space (thought of as a subgroup) $G$ of $\mathbb{Z}_2^n$. We can then think of $G$ as identifying the vertices of the hypercube and it is fairly obvious that we can then quotient $B_n$ by $G$ to get some quotient space $B_n/G$.

Now, I'm interested in constructing a "tangent bundle" for this quotient which is not quite a manifold and then calculate / construct the Stiefel-Whitney classes for this bundle. I use quotes since I'm not sure about how to do this, or if it is well-defined.

  • are the quotients $B_n/G$ for these "well-behaved looking" $G$ well-understood as topological spaces? In particular, do we know their cohomologies? I can see $H^1(B_n/G) = G$, but that's about it for now =) It looks like equivariant cohomology would come into play, but my topology skills are elementary and I don't have a feeling of what is "easy" or "hard" in equivariant cohomology.
  • what is the correct notion of "tangent bundle" for this kind of orbifold, if any? $B_n$ itself is a nice $n$-manifold with boundary, so it seems like I want to look at something like $TB_n/G \rightarrow B_n/G$, but I am in alien waters and I feel I should be careful about singularities.
  • A natural followup question: if so, we can formally define Stiefel-Whitney classes (and spin structures). Are its Stiefel-Whitney classes well-understood?

Some googling has led me to two papers:

and I'm trying to read them now, but advice from experts would be great. =)

share|cite|improve this question
I think this question partially has answers for yours:… – Anton Fetisov Jul 15 '13 at 18:43

As far as (co)homology is concerned, you may replace the orbifold quotient of a manifold $M$ by a finite group $G$ by the so-called Borel construction $(M\times EG)/G$. The "tangent bundle" of the orbifold is then a usual vector bundle over the space $(M\times EG)/G$, and you can define all the usual characteristic classes.

I should say:
- $EG$ is a contractible $G$-space with free action.
- The total space of the "tangent bundle" is $(TM\times EG)/G$.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.