-1

1

Hi all. My question today will be regarding what I consider to be a "stumbling block" while trying to research odd perfect numbers.

Let $N = {q^k}{n^2}$ be an odd perfect number with Euler prime $q$. Since $\gcd(q, n) = 1$, we know that $q \neq n$.

In 2008, I proved that $q^k < n^2$. This implies that, if $n < q$, then Sorli's conjecture that $k = {\nu}_q(N) = 1$ would follow.

I currently know that $I(q) \leq 6/5 < \sqrt{5/3} < I(n)$, where $I(x) = \sigma(x)/x$ is the abundancy index of $x$. In particular, this means that $$\frac{\sigma(q)}{\sigma(n)} < \frac{q}{n}$$.

Thus, if $q < n$, then $\sigma(q) < \sigma(n)$. (The contrapositive of this last implication is $\sigma(n) < \sigma(q)$ implies that $n < q$.)

Now, since $\sigma(q) = q + 1$, I believe we have three cases to consider:

Case 1: $q < \sigma(q) < n < \sigma(n)$

Case 2: $n < q < \sigma(q) \leq \sigma(n)$

Case 3: $n < \sigma(n) \leq q < \sigma(q)$

I also know that $$\frac{\sigma(q)}{n} \neq \frac{\sigma(n)}{q}.$$

My problem is: How do I dispose of Case 2? The motivation is that I want to establish an equivalence between the inequalities $\frac{\sigma(q)}{n} < \frac{\sigma(n)}{q}$ and $q < n$. This way, all it takes to prove Sorli's conjecture will be to show that $\frac{\sigma(n)}{q} < \frac{\sigma(q)}{n}$.

My idea is to show that $$\frac{\sigma(q)}{\sigma(n)} \leq 1 < \frac{q}{n}$$ cannot occur by considering two separate cases under Case 2:

Case 2A: $\frac{\sigma(q)}{n} < \frac{\sigma(n)}{q}$

Under this case:

$$\frac{\sigma(n)}{q} > \sqrt[4]{\frac{5}{3}}$$ $$2 > \frac{\sigma(n)}{n} > \sqrt{\frac{5}{3}}$$ $$1 < \frac{\sigma(q)}{q} \le \frac{6}{5}$$ $$\frac{\sigma(q)}{n} < \frac{2}{\sqrt[4]{\frac{5}{3}}}$$

$$\frac{\sigma(q)}{n} < \frac{\sigma(n)}{q}$$ $$\frac{\sigma(q)}{q} < \frac{\sigma(n)}{n}$$

Consequently:

$$\sigma(q)\left(\frac{1}{n} + \frac{1}{q}\right) < \sigma(n)\left(\frac{1}{q} + \frac{1}{n}\right)$$ $$\sigma(q) < \sigma(n)$$

Therefore:

$$\frac{\sigma(q)}{\sigma(n)} < 1$$

and:

$$\frac{n}{q} = \frac{\frac{\sigma(q)}{q}}{\frac{\sigma(q)}{n}} > \frac{\sqrt[4]{\frac{5}{3}}}{2} \approx 0.56811$$

Case 2B: $\frac{\sigma(n)}{q} < \frac{\sigma(q)}{n}$

Under this case:

$$\frac{\sigma(n)}{q} < \frac{2}{\sqrt[4]{\frac{5}{3}}}$$ $$\frac{\sigma(n)}{n} < 2$$ $$\frac{6}{5} \geq \frac{\sigma(q)}{q} > 1$$ $$\frac{\sigma(q)}{n} > \sqrt[4]{\frac{5}{3}}$$

$$\frac{\sigma(n)}{q} < \frac{\sigma(q)}{n}$$ $$\frac{\sigma(q)}{q} < \frac{\sigma(n)}{n}$$

Consequently:

$$\frac{1}{q}\left(\sigma(n) + \sigma(q)\right) < \frac{1}{n}\left(\sigma(q) + \sigma(n)\right)$$ $$n < q$$

Therefore:

$$\frac{\sigma(q)}{\sigma(n)} = \frac{\frac{\sigma(q)}{q} + \frac{\sigma(q)}{n}}{\frac{\sigma(n)}{q} + \frac{\sigma(n)}{n}} > \frac{1 + \sqrt[4]{\frac{5}{3}}}{\frac{2}{\sqrt[4]{\frac{5}{3}}} + 2} \approx 0.56811$$

and

$$\frac{n}{q} < 1$$

I was wondering if anybody out there would have some (better) ideas on how to improve on the bounds for $\frac{n}{q}$ in Case 2A and for $\frac{\sigma(q)}{\sigma(n)}$ in Case 2B. In particular, a sharp upper bound for $I(n) = \sigma(n)/n$ would be nice!

flag
1 
I think the votes to close are premature. Arnie: This would be a better question if you focused in on a particular case. Forget about cases 1 and 3, and maybe even 2b. Give it a little bit of motivation as to where your question comes from, and then ask if anyone knows an improvement of a specific bound. – Cam McLeman Feb 23 at 15:15
Thank you Cam for your comment and suggestions. The motivation for this question is an attempt to prove Sorli's conjecture for odd perfect numbers. Editing my question now to reflect your suggestions... – Arnie Dris Feb 24 at 7:05
I would like to add that, if $n < q$, then the Euler prime $q$ becomes the largest prime factor of the odd perfect number $N = {q^k}{n^2}$. – Arnie Dris Feb 24 at 8:52
8 
Forgive me if this is an unfair comment, but what I think when I see this question is here is a large amount of high school algebra followed by a request that someone else supply some serious mathematics. – Gerry Myerson Feb 24 at 11:13
@Gerry, please define "serious mathematics" in light of your observation that "here is a large amount of high school algebra". Additionally, given that what I have written is just high school stuff, as you say, I believe that you would be in the better capacity to supply the "serious mathematics" that you allude to. – Arnie Dris Feb 25 at 4:24
show 2 more comments

1 Answer

0

This is a partial answer to my question, in light of a slight improvement on the lower bound for $\frac{n}{q}$ in Case 2A.

Under Case 2A, we have $\frac{\sigma(q)}{n} < \frac{\sigma(n)}{q}$. Therefore:

$$\frac{q}{n}I(q) < \frac{n}{q}I(n)$$

which implies that:

$${\left(\frac{n}{q}\right)}^2 > \frac{I(q)}{I(n)}.$$

Since $1 < I(q) < I(n) < 2$, we have:

$$\frac{n}{q} > \frac{\sqrt{2}}{2} \approx 0.7071.$$

link|flag
5 
To quote Yemon Choi, who commented on an earlier question you asked (and also answered yourself): This question, and this answer, seem dangerously close to using MO as a kind of public blog or attempted polymath.... – Woett Mar 11 at 0:20

Your Answer

Get an OpenID
or

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.