MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Jacquet, Piateski-Shapiro, and Shalika defined new vectors for generic representations of $GL(n,F)$, where $F$ is a non-archimedean local field. I know that this notion has been extended to $GSp(4,F)$. Is there an extension to other $p$-adic groups?

share|cite|improve this question
I edited your post, I hope you don't mind. – GH from MO Feb 21 '12 at 22:57
No problem GH, but there is a french proverb saying that "Lorsque l'on tombe, ce n'est pas le pied qui a tort. " – Rajkarov Feb 22 '12 at 3:47
up vote 7 down vote accepted

The theory of new vectors for ${\rm GSp}(4)$ has been written by Schmidt and Roberts :

Local Newforms for GSp(4). Springer Lecture Note in Mathematics, vol. 1918 (2007)

See also Schmidt's webpage :

The definition is trickier than in the case of ${\rm GL}(N)$

By the way : there is a mistake in Jacquet/Piateski-Shapiro/Shalika. It was pointed out and fixed by Matringe :

arXiv:1201.5506 Essential Whittaker functions for GL(n). Nadir Matringe.

See also Jacquet's webpage.

New vectors are also known for generic representations of reductive groups of small ranks (in fact of rank $1$) : ${\rm SL}(2)$, unitary groups.

There is no general theory (except for spherical representations).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.