Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

This result is apparently well known and used by many people. I am, however, quite frustrated that I cannot seem to find a proof that I can understand. For plane algebraic curves, this is not too hard. For an irreducible polynomial $F(x,y) \in \mathbb{C}[x,y]$ nonconstant in both $x$ and $y$ with $F(0,0) = 0$, one can formally expand $y$ as a Puiseux series in $x$ $$ y(x) = \sum_{i=0}^\infty y_i x^{\alpha_i} $$ The Puiseux theorem actually states that such a series converges (in some sense) near $x=0$. Alternatively, we can construct Riemann surface over the point $(0,0)\in \mathbb{C}^2$ of the algebraic function $y(x)$ which has the normal representation as holomorphic element $$ \begin{eqnarray} x &=& t^m \cr y &=& \sum_{i=1}^\infty y_i t^i \end{eqnarray} $$ With some abuse of notation, I think we can even say the two are the same. I can find many sources, among which I like Walker's representation the best.

Now how about space algebraic curves (of one complex dimension) in $\mathbb{C}^n$? For a polynomial system $F(x_0,\ldots,x_n) = (f_1(x_0,\ldots,x_n),\ldots,f_n(x_0,\ldots,x_n))$ where each $f_i \in \mathbb{C}[x_0,\ldots,x_n]$ with $F(0,\ldots,0) = (0,\ldots,0)$, and lies only on a one (complex) dimensional irreducible component of $V(F)$, if we fix a place of the this algebraic curve centred at $(0,\ldots,0)$, we should be able to find a parametrization $$ \begin{eqnarray} x_0 &=& t^m \cr x_k &=& \sum_{i=1}^\infty c_{k,i} t^i \end{eqnarray} $$ with convergent power series. Or equivalently, we could express $x_1,\ldots,x_n$ as Puiseux series in $x_0$ that converge in certain sense.

I could only find "proofs" that reference Hironaka's resolution of singularity, which I don't think I can understand any time soon. I'm hoping to find a proof using only complex geometry or basic complex algebraic geometry. In particular, I was thinking maybe I can repeatedly apply Weierstrass preparation theorem together with Puiseux theorem, however, I'm not quite sure how to continue after the first step.

share|improve this question
    
The algebraic closure of $\mathbb{C}((t))$ is $\cup_n \mathbb{C}((t^{1/n}))$. The proof of this obviously reduce to the case of plane curves and implies what you want. Serre's Corps Locaux, for instance, has an algebraic proof. –  Felipe Voloch Feb 19 '12 at 3:52
    
I'm not sure if I understand this. I know the algebraic closure of the ring of formal Laurent series is the formal Puiseux series, and this form a basis for the formal local parametrization of plane algebraic curves. But I still don't see how this extends to the case of space algebraic curves, unless I'm missing something. I just did a quick check on Serre's Local Fields (my French is, uh..., terrible), and I couldn't find it. Do you happen to remember which chapter is it in? Either way, a purely algebraic proof is probably not enough, as it require the concept of convergences. –  ssquidd Feb 19 '12 at 4:15
2  
A space algebraic curve, by virtue of being an algebraic curve, has a function field of transcendence degree one over $\mathbb{C}$, so for any coordinate function $t$ that you pick, the other coordinate functions will be algebraic functions on $t$, thus will be inside the algebraic closure of $\mathbb{C}((t))$. This does not give convergence in the complex topology. I missed that part of your question and I don't know a good reference offhand. The reference in Serre is Ch. 4, Prop. 8. –  Felipe Voloch Feb 19 '12 at 4:36

1 Answer 1

up vote 2 down vote accepted

If $(C,0)$ is a germ of complex curve in $\mathbb{C}^n$, then you can find coordinates $(z_1, z')$ and a polydisc $V=V_1\times V'$ centered in $0$ such that the canonical projection $V\ni (z_1,z')\mapsto \pi(z_1,z')=z_1\in V_1$ is a ramified covering when restricted to $C$ with $p$ sheets. Let $S$ be the ramification locus, then $S$ is an analytic set in $V_1$, that is, a discrete set of points. Therefore, upon taking a smaller $V_1$, we can think that $S=\{0\}$ or it is empty. Let us suppose $S$ is not empty, otherwise the projection is a local biholomorphism with the unit disc and this gives the thesis with $z_1=t$, $z_k=f_k(t)$, $f_k\in\mathcal{O}(D )$. Now, $C^*=C\cap \pi^{-1}(V_1\setminus S)$ is a $p-$sheeted covering of $V_1\setminus S=D\setminus\{0\}$, therefore it is isomorphic to the standard $p-$sheeted covering: $$D\setminus\{0\}\ni t\mapsto t^p\in D\setminus\{0\}.$$ This means that there exists a map $g:D\setminus\{0\}\to C^*$ such that $\pi\circ g (t)=t^p$; this map extends clearly to a holomorphic bijection by setting $g(0)=0$ (it is continuous in $0$ and holomorphic outside). Therefore, we have $$z_1=t^p$$ $$z_k=g_k(t)=\sum_{j=0}^\infty a_{kj}t^j.$$

The existence of such a system of coordinates is a standard result in local complex geometry, sometimes called local parametrization theorem.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks. This is indeed very helpful. A month after I first post this question, I found the local parametrization theorem in a book by Gunning & Rossi. It's not very easy for me to follow, but I'm trying to understand it. –  ssquidd Mar 22 '12 at 0:02

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.