# Character determines the representation?

Consider a semisimple Lie group or a $p$ adic reductive group $G$.

To what extent can the character of a representation as a distribution on $C_c^\infty(G)$ determine the representation?

-
As BR indicates (and the context of your question requires) the group representations here are not completely arbitrary. I think the qualifier "irreducible admissible" is safest in both settings. Such questions are usually more delicate for instance when working over a function field in prime characteristic. – Jim Humphreys Feb 15 '12 at 23:25

For reductive $p$-adic groups, the character characterizes irreducible admissible representations., in that inequivalent irreducible admissible representations have linearly independent characters. See, e.g., Section 17 of Murnaghan's notes.
Professor Adams : Chapter 2 of Casselman's notes at leas states this result (Proposition 2.3.1), for an arbitrary locally compact Hausdorff group such that the compact open subgroups form a basis of neighborhoods at the identity (proof is referred to J-L, I haven't checked it). And independently, a clarification for someone who might be relatively new to the subject and reading this : the original question does not explicitly mention the admissibility assumption. However, it is only for admissible representations that the character is defined on $C_c^{\infty}(G)$ as a distribution. – anādimadhyānta Feb 16 '12 at 16:44
anādimadhyānta, the proof in Jacquet/Langlands looks general, but I wouldn't be surprised if there is some subtle assumption there. Perhaps someone will enlighten us :) Additionally, to add to the second part of you comment, in the archimedean case something stronger than admissibility is required for the existence of characters. Wallach (Real Reductive Groups I) requires finite-generation, while Knapp requires a bound on the rate of growth of the multiplicities of the $K$-types. – B R Feb 16 '12 at 17:04
In the $p$-adic setting, as Anadimadhyanta wrote, the answer is yes for admissible complex representations of locally profinite topological groups. Another reference is Bernstein and Zelevinsky : Representations of the group ${\rm GL}(n,F)$, where $F$ is a local non-Archimedean field. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk 10, No.3, 5-70 (1976), corollary (2.20) page 21. – Paul Broussous Feb 17 '12 at 13:19