MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

It's known that for a random vector $(X_1,\dots,X_n)\in \mathbb{R}^n$ with a log-concave distribution, any subvector has a long-concave distribution. I'm wondering if there are any results about its converse, in particular, when $(X_1,\dots,X_n)$ is isotropic, $X_i$'s are identically distributed (but not necessarily independent) and each $X_i$ is log-concave.

Is this true when $n=2$? That is,

Suppose that $X$ and $Y$ are identically distributed subject to some log-concave distribution with $E[X]=E[Y]=0$, $E[X^2]=E[Y^2]=1$ and $E[XY]=0$. Is the joint distribution of $(X,Y)$ log-concave?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 3 down vote accepted

No. Let $X$ be, say, a standard normal random variable, $Z$ an independent random variable with $P[Z=1] = P[Z=-1] = 1/2$, and $Y=XZ$. Then $X$ and $Y$ are uncorrelated standard normal (in particular log-concave) random variables, but the distribution of $(X,Y)$ is not log-concave.

This is of course also a counterexample to the false theorem one sometimes hears stated that "uncorrelated normal random variables are independent." (The theorem becomes true if "jointly" is inserted in the right place.)

share|cite|improve this answer
In this case the joint distribution of $X$ and $Y$ is only supported on the line $y=x$ in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Isn't it a normal distribution along the line so the joint distribution is log-concave? – Y L Feb 13 '12 at 18:29
The joint distribution is supported on the union of the line $y=x$ and the line $y=-x$. – Mark Meckes Feb 13 '12 at 19:56

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.