Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Real projective spaces ℝPn have ℤ/2 cohomology rings ℤ/2[x]/(xn+1) and total Stiefel-Whitney class (1+x)n+1 which is 1 when n is odd, so it follows that odd dimensional ones are boundaries of compact (n+1)-manifolds. My question is: are there any especially nice constructions of these (n+1)-manifolds?

I'm especially interested in the case n=3. I believe we can get an explicit example of a 4-manifold bound by ℝP3 using Rokhlin/Lickorish-Wallace but it doesn't look like that would generalize to higher dimensions at all easily. Are there a lot of different 4-manifolds with this property?

share|improve this question

3 Answers 3

up vote 28 down vote accepted

$\mathbb RP^3$ double-covers the lens space $L_{4,1}$, so it's the boundary of the mapping cylinder of that covering map.

In general $\mathbb RP^n$ for $n$ odd double-covers such a lens space. So in general $\mathbb RP^n$ is the boundary of a pretty standard $I$-bundle over the appropriate lens space. To be specific, define the general $L_{4,1}$ as $S^{2n-1} / \mathbb Z_4$ where $Z_4 \subset S^1$ are the 4-th roots of unity, and we're using the standard action of the unit complex numbers on an odd dimensional sphere $S^{2n-1} \subset \mathbb C^n$.

Edit: generalizing Tim's construction, you have the fiber bundle $S^1 \to S^{2n-1} \to \mathbb CP^{n-1}$. This allows you to think of $S^{2n-1}$ as the boundary of the tautological $D^2$-bundle over $\mathbb CP^{n-1}$. You can mod out the whole bundle by the antipodal map and you get $\mathbb RP^{2n-1}$ as the boundary of the disc bundle over $\mathbb CP^{n-1}$ with Euler class $2$. So this gives you an orientable manifold bounding $\mathbb RP^{2n-1}$ while my previous example was non-orientable.

share|improve this answer
    
Both answers are very nice. –  Greg Kuperberg Dec 14 '09 at 6:10
    
Is there a standard reference explaining why the mapping cylinders are smooth manifolds with boundary? Also, what do you mean by "I-bundle"? –  Jason DeVito Feb 8 '10 at 20:57
1  
You can prove it directly, avoiding the need for a reference. The automorphism group of $I$ is $\mathbb Z_2$, so the classifying space for $I$-bundles is $B\mathbb Z_2=\mathbb RP^\infty$, a map $M\to \mathbb RP^\infty$ is an element of $H^1(M;\mathbb Z_2)$. Then ask yourself how you classify 2-sheeted covers of $M$, these are index-two subgroups of $\pi_1 M$, which correspond to epi-morphisms $\pi_1 M \to \mathbb Z_2$ which factor through $H_1 M$, so these are also elements of $H^1(M;\mathbb Z_2)$ then you connect the dots. –  Ryan Budney Feb 8 '10 at 21:58
    
Oh, $I$-bundle means a fibre bundle over a space, with fibre an interval ($I$). Since $Homeo(I)$, $Diff(I)$, $Aut_{PL}(I)$ all have the homotopy-type of $\mathbb Z_2$, you can assume the structure group is $\mathbb Z_2$. –  Ryan Budney Feb 8 '10 at 22:22
    
I can't believe I didn't realize that "I" stood for "interval". Thanks for the clarification! –  Jason DeVito Feb 9 '10 at 1:50

$\mathbb{RP}^3$ is the unit (co)tangent bundle to $S^2$. Thus it bounds the disc bundle in $TS^2$. Alternatively, any time you have a 2-sphere of self-intersection $\pm 2$ in a closed 4-manifold - for example, any Lagrangian sphere in a symplectic 4-manifold - you get a splitting into two pieces along an $\mathbb{RP}^3$. So, you could consider the diagonal $S^2$ in $S^2\times S^2$, for instance.

share|improve this answer

Take the complex surface $Z_1 ^2 + Z_2 ^2 + Z_3^2 =1$ in complex 3-space, $C^3$ and intersect it with the ball
$|Z_1|^2 + |Z_2|^2 + |Z_3|^2 \le 1$ to get an explicit 4-manifold with boundary embedded in $C^3$ whose boundary is $RP^3$, realized by intersecting the complex surface with the 5-sphere $|Z_1|^2 + |Z_2|^2 + |Z_3|^2 = 1$ To verify, split $Z_a = x_a + i y_a$ into its real and imaginary parts $x_a, y_a$, do a bit of algebra and see that the hypersurface is diffeomorphic to the tangent bundle of the standard two-sphere $S^2$, that two-sphere being realized within $(x_1, x_2, x_3)$ space by setting the $y_a = 0$. (I've heard this complex surface called the hypersphere' or complex sphere' or some such.) Intersecting the hypersurface with the 5-ball $|Z_1|^2 + |Z_2|^2 + |Z_3|^2 \le 1$ is the same as taking the disc bundle of Tim Penultz's construction. Setting $|Z_1|^2 + |Z_2|^2 + |Z_3|^2 = 1$ within the hypersurface is the $RP^3$ which bounds the 4-manifold. So, you can take your 4-manifold to be a ``Stein domain'' in standard $C^3$.


Even more explicitly, with a CR-aside:

After some rescalings, this embedding of $RP^3$ is essentially Rossi's example of an analytic CR structure on the three-sphere which admits no CR embedding into any $C^n$. Consider the map from $C^2$ to $C^3$ given by $$Z_1 = i[ (z^2 + w^2) + t (\bar z ^2 + \bar w ^2)]$$ $$Z_2 = [ (z^2 - w^2) - t (\bar z ^2 - \bar w ^2)]$$ $$Z_3 = 2 [ zw - t \bar z \bar w]$$ where $t$ is real and $i = \sqrt{-1}$. A computation shows that $Z_1 ^2 + Z_2 ^2 + Z_3^2 =-4 t (|z|^2 + |w|^2)^2$ while $|Z_1|^2 + |Z_2|^2 + |Z_3|^2 = 2(1 + t^2)(|z|^2 + |w|^2)^2$ It follows that the image of the standard $S^3$ in $C^2$ is the complex hypersurface $Z_1 ^2 + Z_2 ^2 + Z_3^2 =-4 t $ intersected with the 5-ball
$|Z_1|^2 + |Z_2|^2 + |Z_3|^2 = 2(1 + t^2)$. Since the map $(z, w) \to (Z_1, Z_2, Z_3)$ is $2:1$ restricted to $S^3$, its image is $RP^3$.

Rossi's no CR embedding' assertion for $t \ne 0$ relates to the induced CR structure on $S^3$ (via the pull-back of its image's CR structure). When $t \ne 0$ every CR function for this CR structure on $S^3$ is an analytic function of these $Z_i (z,w)$'s, and hence is invariant under the antipodal map $(z,w) \to (-z, -w)$. Thus the CR functions for thesetwisted' CR structures on $S^3$ cannot separate (antipodal) points and hence the $S^3$ cannot be CR-embedded.

It is a fun fact that all left-invariant CR structures on $SU(2) = S^3$ arise this way, with the standard CR structure corresponding to $t = 0$.

some references:

H. Rossi, Attaching analytic spaces to an analytic space along a pseudoconcave boundary. 1965 Proc. Conf. Complex Analysis (Minneapolis, 1964) pp. 242–256, Springer, Berlin.

D. Burns, Global behavior of some tangential Cauchy-Riemann equations in “Partial Differential Equations and Geometry” (Proc. Conf., Park City, Utah, 1977); Dekker, New York, 1979, p. 51.

E. Falbel, Non-embeddable CR-manifolds and Surface Singularities. Invent. Math. 108 (1992), No. 1, 49-65.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.