MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In the definition of smooth morphisms, Hartshorne use the notation $dim_{k(x)}(\Omega_{X/Y}\otimes k(x))$· But $\Omega_{X/Y}\otimes k(x)$ is a sheaf, what is the dimension? Thanks for any intepretation.

share|cite|improve this question
The sheaf in question is a sheaf over the residue field, which means that it can be viewed as vector space over the residue field. – Mike Skirvin Feb 11 '12 at 7:30
Can you explain how to view? – MZWang Feb 11 '12 at 7:46
Your question is really about notation. Another way to understand this is to first take the stalk at $x$ to get an $\mathcal{O}_x$-module, and then tensor by the residue field. – Donu Arapura Feb 11 '12 at 10:33
Dear MZWang, $k(x)$ is a field. On the other hand, anything tensored with $k(x)$ has an action of $k(x)$ -- multiplication on the right. Thus it's a $k(x)$-vector space. – Karl Schwede Feb 11 '12 at 15:25
Thanks to dear all. I think Donu have resolveed my confusion. – MZWang Feb 12 '12 at 6:54

Let $k$ be a field. To give a quasi-coherent sheaf on $\mathrm{Spec} \ k$ is equivalent to giving a $k$-vector space. (To give a coherent sheaf on $\mathrm{Spec} \ k$ is to give a finite-dimensional $k$-vector space.) The dimension of the sheaf is then defined to be the dimension of this $k$-vector space.

share|cite|improve this answer
I'm not quite sure this true. Surely giving a sheaf on $\textrm{Spec} \ k$ is the same as giving an abelian group? If you want it to be a vector space, don't you need the sheaf to be a sheaf of $\mathcal{O}_{\textrm{Spec} \ k}$-modules? – Daniel Loughran Feb 11 '12 at 16:26
@Daniel: Strictly speaking, "sheaf" is not a shorthand for "sheaf of abelian groups" either (unless you say so). – user2035 Feb 11 '12 at 18:09
@Harized probably you want to replace the $k$ in "$k$-dimensional" with some other letter. – Keenan Kidwell Feb 11 '12 at 21:25

This is a possible answer to the title of your question, it is not intended to interpret $\dim_{k(x)}(\Omega_{X/Y}\otimes k(x))$ (which is already explained in previous responses).

On a Noetherian scheme, dimension of a coherent sheaf could mean dimension of its support. This is in analogy with the affine case. If $R$ is a Noetherian ring and $M$ is a finitely generated $R$-module then $\dim M=\dim\big( R/\mathrm{ann}(M)\big)=\dim\mathrm{Supp}\ M$, since $\mathrm{Supp}\ M=V\big(\mathrm{ann}(M)\big)$.

share|cite|improve this answer
I'm worried that this post might confuse the OP, as the definition of dimension that you have given does not conincide with the definition that they are interested in. Namely with your definition all locally free sheaves have dimension $\textrm {dim}$ $ X$, whereas $\textrm{dim}_{k(x)}(\Omega_{X/Y} \otimes k(x))$ can certainly vary with $Y$. – Daniel Loughran Feb 11 '12 at 16:21
Dear Daniel: that is why I began my post by saying: "This is a possible answer to the title of your question, it is not intended to interpret $\dim_{k(x)}(\Omega_{X/Y}\otimes k(x))$". Also, note that the title of this question reads: "what is the dimension of a sheaf?" – Mahdi Majidi-Zolbanin Feb 11 '12 at 17:04

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.