Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Say $X$ is a smooth algebraic variety, $U$ is a Zariski open set in $X$, $L$ is a local system on $U$, and $IC(L)$ the intersection cohomology sheaf on $X$ which restricts to $L$ on $U$. Then is:

$$\dim L_u \ge \sum_i \dim \mathrm{H}^i(\mathrm{IC}(L)_x) $$

for $u \in U$ and all $x \in X$?

If not, is it true after e.g. putting in some scalar depending only on the dimension of $X$?

share|improve this question
add comment

1 Answer

up vote 2 down vote accepted

The answer to the first question is certainly "no": you can easily find example of X whose IC complex (for the trivial local system of rank 1) has (total) stalk of dimension $\geq 1$ (for instance this is true for most nilpotent orbit closures in a simple Lie algebra).

Edit: Sorry I missed the assumption that X is smooth. But still I think the following is a counterexample. First, let $Y$ in ${\mathbb C}^n$ be a generic homogeneous hypersurface of degree d (it is smooth away from 0). Let $Z$be its projectivization. Then if I am not mistaken, the stalks of the IC sheaf of $Y$ at $0$ live in dimensions $-(n-1)$ and $-(n-2)$ and they are equal to $H^0(Z)$ and $H^1(Z)$ respectively (I am using perverse normalization). Now take $n=3$. Then $Z$ is a curve of degree $d$ in $\mathbb P^2$, so its genus is $g=\frac{(d-1)(d-2)}{2}$ and its $H^1$ has dimension $2g$. Now there is a finite map $\pi:Y\to \mathbb C^2$ of degree $d$ (take for example $Y$ to be given by the equation $x^d+y^d+z^d=0$ and consider the projection to $(x,y)$). Then $\pi_*$ of the constant sheaf is going to be equal to its Goresky-Macpherson extension from an open subset, where it will be equal to a local system $L$ of rank $d$. But the sum on the right hand side of your expression for $x=0$ is $1+(d-1)(d-2)$.

share|improve this answer
    
All such X which I know, e.g. the nilpotent orbit closures you are talking about, are singular. If X is smooth the IC complex of the trivial local system on a Zariski open is certainly the constant sheaf on X! –  Vivek Shende Feb 10 '12 at 22:20
    
Oh, sorry, I missed the assumption that $X$ is smooth –  Alexander Braverman Feb 10 '12 at 22:25
    
I edited my answer: I think now I can construct and honest counterexample. –  Alexander Braverman Feb 10 '12 at 22:59
    
Why should $\pi_*(IC(Y))$ be just the extension of the constant sheaf? BBD tells you that this extension is in there, but a priori couldn't there could be other summands supported inside $x^d + y^d = 0$? (I'll try actually computing the IC in this example though and see...) –  Vivek Shende Feb 11 '12 at 0:57
    
by "extension of the constant sheaf" I meant "extension of the restriction to the open locus" which is of course not a constant sheaf. –  Vivek Shende Feb 11 '12 at 0:58
show 2 more comments

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.