MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

In the proof, the author consider the normalization $\tilde{A}$ of $A$ and show $\tilde{A}/t \tilde{A}$ is a integral domain. He showed that the localizations at points of Spec $A$ are domains, but we know a non-domain ring can have integral localizations. How should I understand the proof? Thanks a lot.

share|cite|improve this question
Thank for Schwede's edit. – MZWang Feb 5 '12 at 10:30
I don't understand your question: $A$ is supposed to be a local noetherian domain -- so he doesn't have to work to prove it is a domain! – Julien Puydt Aug 26 '12 at 14:47
Julien, the problem is to show $\tilde{A}/t\tilde{A}$ is a domain. – MZWang Aug 30 '12 at 3:32

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.