Welcome to MathOverflow

Question

12

1

I am curious about how the Heegaard genus changes after a finite covering.

Is there anyone constructing an closed hyperbolic 3-manifold $N$ such that

the Heegaard genus of a finite covering of $N$ is less than the Heegaard genus of $N$?

Thank you!

Note: Heegaard genus of a 3-manifold means the minimal genus of all Heegaard splittings.

flag	asked Jan 27 2012 at 7:27 yanqing 489●1●7

Michael Siler · Accepted Answer · 2012-01-27 15:05:32Z UTC

13

There are examples like this. Check out section 4.5 of Shalen's paper "Hyperbolic volume, Heegaard genus and ranks of groups." It's here: http://arxiv.org/abs/0904.0191

He gives a reference for a genus 3 example by Alan Reid and a sketch of a technique for producing examples by Hyam Rubinstein. Shalen also conjectures that the genus can drop by at most 1 in a finite cover of a closed hyperbolic 3-manifold.

answered Jan 27 2012 at 15:05

Michael Siler
277●1●6

	I think there's a variation on Hyam's construction, where you can take a non-orientable manifold with a non-orientable Heegaard splitting, whose 2-fold orientation cover has an orientable splitting of smaller genus than a Heegaard splitting downstairs. – Agol Jan 27 2012 at 21:46
	thanks for both of your answers – yanqing Jan 28 2012 at 0:44

Yo'av Rieck · Answer 2 · 2012-04-04 02:19:32Z UTC

Hyam Rubinstein and me have results about the behavior of the Heegaard genus under double covers for non-Haken manifolds, see http://arxiv.org/abs/math/0607145. Essentially, we show that the Heegaard genera of the two manifolds bound each other linearly. (The statement is a little more complicated for branched covers.)

Heegaard splitting of covering hyperbolic manifold.

Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)

2 Answers

You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.