Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Does there exist Fuchsian groups, which is not conjugated in $SL(2, \mathbb{R})$ to a subgroup of $SL(2, \mathbb{Z})$, but still contains a congruence subgroup?

share|improve this question

1 Answer 1

up vote 5 down vote accepted

How about the normalizer of $\Gamma_0(N)$ in $PSL_2(\mathbb{R})$ for $N > 1$, which is the subgroup generated by $\Gamma_0(N)$ and $\begin{pmatrix} 0 & -1 \\ N & 0 \end{pmatrix}$?

(I wouldn't call these "non-congruence subgroups" as you do in your title: that technical term is usually parsed as "(non-congruence) subgroup". This isn't a subgroup of $PSL_2(\mathbb{Z})$ at all, but it certainly contains a principal congruence subgroup; perhaps we should call it a "congruence non-subgroup"?)

share|improve this answer
2  
This normalizer is indeed a discrete subgroup of $\mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbf{R})$. For the property that no conjugate is contained in $\mathrm{PSL}_2(\mathbf{Z})$, I think one needs some assumption on $N$. This is true for example if $N$ is prime (this is Exercise 1.46 in Shimura's book Intro. to the arithm. theory of autom. functions). But in general I think there are counterexamples e.g. for $N=p^4$ with $p$ prime. –  François Brunault Jan 27 '12 at 10:50
    
Okay, I recognize them now as the other maximal compact subgroup, which are useful when classifying supercuspidals. –  Marc Palm Apr 6 '12 at 15:19

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.