Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Suppose that we have a complex manifold $X$, and a line bundle $L$ over $X$. It is known that the line bundles over $X$ are parametrized by their Chern class, the Chern class being the cohomology class of the curvature of a connection on $L$, which must be integral. Thus $L$ admits a connection with curvature $\omega$ iff $[\omega]$ is an integral cohomology class.
My question is this: what if we are interested instead in complex connections on $L$ (connections that are $\mathbb{C}$-linear instead of $\mathbb{R}$-linear)? Given a complex (2,0)-form $\omega$ on $X$, under what circumstances will $L$ admit a complex connection with curvature $\omega$?

share|cite|improve this question
Perhaps what you mean to ask is which holomorphic closed 2-forms on a complex manifold $X$ can be realized as the curvature form of a holomorphic connexion on a given holomorphic line bundle on $X$ (the line bundle needs to be topologically trivial for such a connection to exist). –  Gil Bor Jan 22 '12 at 21:25
This is the topic of study of this paper: M. Atiyah, "Complex analytic connections in fibre bundles" Transactions of the AMS, 1957, vol. 85, no. 1, 181-207.… –  Brendan Foreman Jan 22 '12 at 23:09

2 Answers 2

up vote 1 down vote accepted

If I understood this right, the answer to your original question is somewhat trivial. You may check that if a complex connection $\nabla$ on $L$ has curvature $\omega$, then the cohomologous $2$-form $\omega+d\alpha$ is the curvature of the connection $\nabla+\alpha$. Hence any closed $2$-form representing integral class can be the curvature form of a complex connection on a line bundle (which just means a $C^\infty$ vector bundle, not holomorphic one).

However, there is a version of your question which admits a non-trivial answer.

If you take $L$ to be a holomorphic line bundle and endow it with a Hermitian metric then there is an unique Hermitian $(1,0)$-connection called the Chern connection, its curvature form $\omega$ is a real-valued (1,1)-form (real-valued means that $\omega=\bar{\omega}$) representing an integral class.

A non-trivial result is that the converse is also true when $X$ is compact Kähler, i.e., any real-valued (1,1)-form representing an integral class is the curvature form of the Chern connection on a Hermitian holomorphic line bundle. This is a consequence of the $\partial\bar\partial$-lemma and the Lefschetz theorem on $(1,1)$-classes.

share|cite|improve this answer

I interpret your line bundle $L$ to be differentiable rather than holomorphic, else the statement that line bundles are parametrized by their Chern class would be completely false.

There always exists a hermitian structure on $L$ and if you choose one, there exists a complex connexion $\nabla $ on $L$ compatible with the hermitian structure on $L$.
The curvature $\omega \in \mathcal E^{1,1}(X)$ of the connexion $\nabla $ is a $(1,1)$ form [and not a (2,0) form!] whose De Rham class computes the first Chern class of $L$ by the formula
$$ c_1(L)=[\frac {i}{2\pi}\omega ] \in H^{1,1} (X,\mathbb C)\subset H^2_{DR} (X,\mathbb C) $$

That Chern class is independent of the chosen hermitian structure on $L$ and is integral in the sense that it lives in the image of the natural group morphism (where $H^2_{sing}$ is the topologists' singular homology)

$$H^2_{sing}(X,\mathbb Z)\to H^2_{sing}(X,\mathbb C)=H^2_{DR} (X,\mathbb C)$$

NB My answer addresses the cohomology class $[ \omega] $ of the curvature. I don't know which $(1,1)$ actual forms $\omega$ you can reach by this procedure.
(You claim that you can reach any $\omega$ with integral class in the real case. I don't know why this is true).

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.