MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Let $M_q(n)$ be the standard quantum matrices (over the complex numbers) with generators $u^i_j$ for $i,j = 1, \ldots ,N$, and reations $$ u^i_ju^k_j = qu^k_ju^i_j, \text{ for } i < k, ~~~~~~~ u^i_ju^k_j = q^{-1}u^k_ju^i_j, \text{ for } i > k, $$ and so on .... The determinant element $\mathrm{det}$ is defined by $$ \mathrm{det} = \sum_{\pi \in S_n} (-q)^{\mathrm{l}(\pi)}u^1_{\pi(1)} \cdots u^N_{\pi(N)}, $$ where $S_N$ is the group of permutations on $N$ objects, and $\mathrm{l}(\pi)$ is the length of $\pi$. Can anyone find a slick way to show that one can also define $\mathrm{det}$ by $$ \mathrm{det} = \sum_{\pi \in S_n} (-q)^{-\mathrm{l}(\pi)}u^N_{\pi(N)} \cdots u^1_{\pi(1)}? $$ I am almost sure it is true (it works for the lower orders) but I can't seem to be able to prove it.

share|cite|improve this question
See Parshall, Wang book/memoirs volume. – Zoran Skoda Jan 20 '12 at 21:01
up vote 3 down vote accepted

The good approach to prove anything about (q)-determinats was proposed by Y. I. Manin. It is via (q)-Grassman algebra.

If I am understanding yours question correctly, then answer can be obtained on the following route.

Consider (q)-Grassman variables $\psi_i \psi_j = -q \psi_j \psi_i , ~ i < j $ and $\psi_i^2=0$. Consider matrix $U$ with elements $u_{ij}$

Notation: consider variables $\psi_i^U= \sum_k \psi_k U_{ki}$,

Standard Lemma (Manin): $det_q(M) \prod_i \psi_i = \prod_i \psi_i^U$ - this holds for any matrix "U" - do not need not satisfy quantum group relations - no relation at all is necessary.

KEY OBSERVATION (Manin): If $U$ satisfy relations of quantum group, then $\psi_i^U$ will q-commute again !!! i.e. $\psi_i^U \psi_j^U= -q \psi_j^U\psi_i^U, ~(\psi_i^U)^2=0 $. (Actually you need only "half" of the relation of quantum group for this lemma to be true. We proposed to call such "half"-quantum matrices "q-Manin" matrices see

Now the question you are asking about become rather obvious. Just consider the product $\psi_1^U\psi_2^U...\psi_n^U$ in the opposite order $=(-q)^{n(n-1)/2} \psi_n^U\psi_{n-1}^U...\psi_1^U$ and also pay attention that variables in the opposite order become $q^{-1}$-commuting. So treating all these power of $q$ correctly we should arrive to yours formula, if I am not mistaking.

If you write me e-mail al. mysurname gmail dot com I can send you some some materials about q-Manin matrices where we discuss things like that...

For q=1 - these q-Manin matrices are NOT commutative - but all theorems of linear algebra can be extended to them in the form precisely like standard commutative. See Algebraic properties of Manin matrices 1 A. Chervov, G. Falqui, V. Rubtsov

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.