MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

I wonder if this problem has already been examined before:

Consider a convex polyhedron that tiles $\mathbb R^3$. What is the maximum of vertices/edges/faces that such a polyhedron can have?

Intuitively, it seems that the truncated octahedron is best possible for edges (36) as well as for vertices (24) Its packing is also known as "bitruncated cubic honeycomb".

For faces, we can do better than 14, as there is a polyhedron with 16 faces that can be obtained as follows: Take a truncated tetrahedron and add on each triangular face a small pyramid that is a quarter of a tetrahedron. The tessellation of it is known as the quarter cubic honeycomb, with each small tetrahedron "distributed" among its four neighbors.

Questions: Are these best possible? What about the corresponding problem in higher dimensions?

In $\mathbb R^4$, it looks like the polytope yielded by the equivalent of the "Quarter cubic honeycomb" tiles it. This one, based on the truncated 5-cell has 25 cells, 60 faces, 60 edges, and 25 vertices, and so for cells and vertices, it does again (slightly) better than the 24-cell with its 96 faces, 96 edges, and 24 vertices.

share|cite|improve this question

In $\mathbb{R}^3$ this is a famous problem.See this nice reference. (Danzer, Grunbaum, Shepard -- Does every type of polyhedron tile three-space). The best example at the time of the writing had 38 faces (an example of Engel). For a lattice (periodic) tiling, the problem was solved (I think) by Delone (AKA Delaunay).

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you very much. So it seems quite hopeless to look for something better in $\mathbb R^4$ in spite of knowing that there are probably solutions with at least 50 cells... – Wolfgang Jan 19 '12 at 17:32
Nothing is hopeless, but serious thought is called for... – Igor Rivin Jan 22 '12 at 15:16

To supplement Igor's citation of Engel's polyhedron, here it is:
      Engel Polyhedron
The figure above is from the paper by Branko Grünbaum and G. C. Shephard, "Tilings with congruent tiles", Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.), Volume 3, Number 3 (1980), 951-973 and is copied from Peter Engel's paper "Über Wirkungsbereichsteilungen von kubischer Symmetrie", Zeitschrift für Kristallographie, volume 154 (1981), number 3–4, 199–215. It is certainly remarkable that this polyhedron tiles space!

Addendum (10Oct13): Now that Günter brought this back to the front page with the precise citation (thanks!), I'll add that a student Tiffany Liu and I 3D-printed copies of the 18-sided plesiohedra found by Löckenhoff and Hellner that tile space so we could see how they fit together. Here they are inside the 3D printer:

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you. Nice article! I see on p.961 that others have had the same idea as me a century before... – Wolfgang Jan 19 '12 at 17:41
it's only a pity that they didn't ask their computer to provide an illustration how to tile space with it. Hopefully their program is trustworthy! – Wolfgang Jan 19 '12 at 21:29

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.