MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

If $G$ is a finite group, and $n$ is the least positive integer such that $G$ can be embedded in symmetric group $S_n$, then, should $G$ necessarily contain a subgroup of index $n$?

share|cite|improve this question

closed as too localized by Mark Sapir, Ryan Budney, Martin Brandenburg, Bill Johnson, Benjamin Steinberg Jan 17 '12 at 13:09

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

There is a cyclic group of order 6 in $S_5$. – S. Carnahan Jan 17 '12 at 9:03
Is it actually known how to compute the least $n$ such that $G$ is a subgroup of $S_n?$ – Igor Rivin Jan 17 '12 at 12:53
@Igor: I think, its not completely known (this problem (your) was posed on mathoverflow). In group theory, if we want to show that a group is isomorphic to $A_n$ or $S_n$, it follows easily if we have subgroup of index $n$. But "Is it correct step to show existence of index n subgroup?", this was a question I wondering. – RDK Jan 18 '12 at 5:11

This is not true. The group $S_3 \times S_2$ can be embedded in $S_5$, but not in smaller symmetric groups.

share|cite|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.