Suppose we have two categories such that presheaves on them are equivalent. What can be said in this situation?
Remember to vote up questions/answers you find interesting or helpful (requires 15 reputation points)
|
8
4
|
||||
|
|
14
|
That their Cauchy completions are equivalent. |
|||||||||||||||
|
You can accept an answer to one of your own questions by clicking the check mark next to it. This awards 15 reputation points to the person who answered and 2 reputation points to you.
|
7
|
Finn's answer, as expanded by Tom, is great. However, since the question is so broad ("what can be said?") let me point out that there is a different thing that can also be said. If $C$ and $D$ have equivalent categories of presheaves, then $C$ and $D$ are equivalent objects in the bicategory of profunctors. In other words, there are profunctors $C \to D$ and $D\to C$ whose composites in either direction are naturally isomorphic to identities. This is also a necessary and sufficient condition. Both Finn's and my answer generalize to enriched categories and enriched presheaves; the only difference is that the notion of "Cauchy completion" is different. In general, it means completion under all absolute colimits. |
||
|
|
|
2
|
Let $k$ be a field. If $A$ and $B$ are (small) $k$-linear categories with $K$-linearly equivalent categories of $k$-linear functors to $k$-vector spaces, then $A$ can be obtained from $B$ by a sequence of "contractions and expansions» from $B$. See Theorem 4.7 in this paper by Claude Cibils and Andrea Solotar. |
||
|
|

