Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

For $n = 3$ the variety $x_1 + x_2 + .. + x_n = 0$, $x_1 x_2 .. x_n = 1$ is an elliptic curve, and for $n = 4$ it is rational [edit: or so I thought, before seeing the other replies].

What can be said, for example regarding rationality, for larger $n$ (for values of $x_i$ where the variety has no components of the same form with smaller $n$)? Is this variety of a standard type, such as toric or Calabi-Yau?

One might assume that it remains rational for $n > 4$; but, given that the degree of the product increases, that might well not be so.

share|improve this question
    
Are you sure the $n=4$ case isn't K3? –  S. Carnahan Jan 14 '12 at 7:57
    
A quick coordinate change yields $x_1\cdots x_{n-1}(x_1 + \cdots x_{n-1}) = -1$, which seems to be Calabi-Yau in general. –  S. Carnahan Jan 14 '12 at 8:01
    
The case $n=4$, and the generalization $x_1 x_2 x_3 x_4 + a = 0$ for arbitrary nonzero $a$, was already studied by Euler. I've given some talks about this (see math.harvard.edu/~elkies/euler_11c.pdf for the most recent version) and should be writing it up soon. Yes, it will be a Calabi-Yau hypersurface in general. –  Noam D. Elkies Jan 14 '12 at 19:37
    
@Noam, thanks for the link! I hope you do write it up soon :) –  Mariano Suárez-Alvarez Jan 15 '12 at 0:35
    
Very interesting Noam, and useful as an extended worked example, in what can otherwise seem a bewilderingly abstract topic! One reason I am interested in this variety is that for $N = 4$, with the extra condition $x_1 x_2 = a^2$ with rational $a$, it is birationally equivalent to a rational box with two face diagonals and body diagonal rational. –  John R Ramsden Jan 15 '12 at 8:31

2 Answers 2

(expanded comment)

For $n = 3$ in $X Y (X + Y) + 1 = 0$ letting $Y = t X$ gives $t (t + 1) = - 1 / X^3 = x^3$ say. Then letting $y = 2 t + 1$ gives $4 x^3 + 1 = y^2$, which is a non-degenerate elliptic curve.

For $n = 4$, in $X + Y + Z + T = 0, X Y Z T = 1$ Letting $X Y, Z T = -u, -1/u$ resp satisfies the second and in the first gives $X Z (X + Z) = X/u + u Z$. Then letting $t = X/Z$ this becomes $t u (t + 1) Z^2 = t + u^2$, in which letting $t = u v, w = 1/Z$ gives $u v (u v + 1) = (u + v) w^2$.

I thought I had a parametrization of the latter; but having found a slip in my algebra, now I'm not so sure. Maybe it is K3.

share|improve this answer
    
According to Magma web calculator n=4 is not rational. Let me know if you need the code. –  joro Jan 14 '12 at 10:09
    
Wow, yes the code would be very useful - I have plenty of other surfaces that need checking! Is there a link to a web page the code can be downloaded from? My email address, in case you need it, is jhnrmsdn@yahoo.co.uk –  John R Ramsden Jan 14 '12 at 13:27
    
DOH! It occurred to me that the code you mentioned must be the program given in your reply. I thought you were talking about Magma web calculator itself! –  John R Ramsden Jan 14 '12 at 13:31
    
@John the code is in the answer. The web interface to magma is the only URL. Paste the code in the web interface or in magma. –  joro Jan 14 '12 at 13:58

According to Magma web calculator $n=4$ is not rational.

After eliminating $x_4$ the surface is $x_1x_2x_3(x_1+x_2+x_3)+1=0$

The program that can be checked in the web calculator:

Q := RationalField();
P<x1,x2,x3> := PolynomialRing(Q, 3);
F<s,t> := RationalFunctionField(Q, 2);
p := x1*x2*x3*(x1+x2+x3)+1;
Solve(p, F);

Don't know how to check for larger $n$.

share|improve this answer

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.