MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Apologies in advance if this is obvious.

share|cite|improve this question
I'm pretty sure it's not guess is there isn't, but I can't think of any counterexamples right off the bat. – Ben Webster Oct 17 '09 at 14:51
So you are asking if there exist a basis for every GIVEN finite subgroup, not one basis that works for every finite subgroup, right? Coz then the answer is no. – shenghao Oct 17 '09 at 19:55
Yes, any particular subgroup. – Qiaochu Yuan Oct 17 '09 at 21:39
The subset of GL_n(\bar{Q}) consisting of matrices such that the matrix AND its inverse have algebraic integer entries is a subgroup, and obviously a group representation with algebraic integer entries would have to land there. – Ben Webster Oct 18 '09 at 1:54
Somewhat related:… Unfortunately, not every ring of algebraic integers (or even cyclotomic integers) is a PID. – Vipul Naik Apr 26 '11 at 20:12
up vote 17 down vote accepted

Not a satisfying argument: We can, first of all, find a basis in which the entries lie in some algebraic number field K. Let O be the ring of integers of K. Then there is a locally free O-module M of rank n preserved by G: add up all the translates of O^n under G. Now, M need not itself be free, but it is isomorphic as an O-module to the sum of various ideals of O. Now pass to an extension L/K so that every ideal class of K trivializes in L, e.g. the Hilbert class field; then G preserves a free rank n module for the ring of integers of L. Sorry!

share|cite|improve this answer

This is not really an answer, but is too long for a comment. The proof given by Moonface above is given in more or less that form in the 1962 book of Curtis and Reiner. As far as I know, it is still open whether all irreducible representations of a finite group $G$ can be realized over $\mathbb{Z}[\omega]$, where $\omega$ is a complex primitive $|G|$-th roots of unity, though I think the paper of Cliff,Ritter and Weiss settles the questions for finite solvable groups. The paper of Serre ( the three letters to Feit) give counterexamples to a slightly different question: they show (among other things) that a representation of a finite group can be realised over some number fields, but might not be able to be realised over the ring of algebraic integers of that field. Brauer's characterization of characters/Brauer's induction theorem show that all representations of the finite group $G$ may be realised over $\mathbb{Q}[\omega]$ for $\omega$ as above ( $|G|$ can be replaced by the exponent of $G$ if desired). As I said, realizability over $\mathbb{Z}[\omega]$ is a different matter.

share|cite|improve this answer

By the way, this paper may be of interest. It shows that for solvable groups, one doesn't have to do the Hilbert class extension moonface suggests, but for some non-solvable ones you do. Also this one has more examples.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.