MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Put $V= \mathbb{C}^3$. Let $D \subset V$ be an isolated singularity and
$\mu: \tilde{V} \rightarrow V$ be a log resolution of the pair $(V,D)$ whose exceptional locus $E$ and the strict transform $\tilde{D}$ satisfies that $\tilde{D} \cup E$ has a normal crossing support. We can define $c_j \in \mathbb{Z}$ such that $K_{\tilde{V}} + \tilde{D} = \mu^* (K_V +D)+ \sum c_j E_j $ where $E = \bigcup E_j$ is the irreducible decomposition.

Question Is there $\mu$ such that $c_j \le 0$ for all $j$?

share|cite|improve this question

The answer is surely no.

If $D$ itself does not have a minimal log smooth resolution, then certainly $(V,D)$ couldn't have such a log resolution you need. On the other hand, there are bunch of isolated surface singularities whose minimal resolution is not log smooth, e.g., the log canonical surface singularity whose minimal log resolution has its exceptional locus an nodal rational curve.

share|cite|improve this answer
Thank you for the comment. I think that every normal surface singularity $D$ has a log resolution such that each discrepancy is non-positive. It is called an essential resolution, e.g. in Ishii's paper. Actually, if I blow up the node of the nodal curve in your example, the coefficient of the $-1$-curve is 0. – tarosano Jan 14 '12 at 18:04
I see. You are right. We also need to consider the curves of discrepancy 0 which doesn't necessarily appear in the minimal resolution of the surface itself. – CYXU Jan 16 '12 at 0:58
Just for safety, maybe the discrepancy of the $-1$-curve is $-1$. – tarosano Mar 4 '13 at 11:24

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.