Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let $(\Omega, \mathcal{F}, P)$ be a probability space, on which $\mathcal{F}_t$ is filtration satisfying general conditions. $W_t$ is a standard Brownian motion. Let $Y_t$ be a martingale given by $$Y_t = \int_0^t \sigma_r d W_r$$ where $\sigma_t$ is a bounded $\mathcal{F}_t$ measurable process.

The question is, assume $\sigma_t>0$ almost surely for all $t$, then can we prove $$P(Y_1 = c) = 0$$ for all constant $c$?

share|improve this question
1  
I think the answer is no. You should be able to construct a counterexample by a continuous time change, or by an SDE of the form $dY=\min(f(t)Y,1)dt$ for suitable $f(t)$. –  George Lowther Dec 24 '11 at 17:35
    
Dear George, By time-change, $Y_t$ is BM under new time scale. In the SDE above, do you mean $d W_t$ instead of $d t$? Even with this, I can not see the counterexample. –  kenneth Dec 25 '11 at 2:30
add comment

3 Answers

up vote 6 down vote accepted

Here's an explicit construction that gives a counterexample. For simplicity let $c=0$ (not important).

First, let $\alpha>0$ and consider the probability that a standard Brownian motion started at 0 hits 0 at some time in the interval $(\alpha t, \alpha t+t)$. Then (1) this probability does not depend on $t$ (by Brownian scaling) -- call it $p_\alpha$; and (2) $p_\alpha\to 1$ as $\alpha\to 0$ (because with probability 1, the standard Brownian motion hits 0 at some time in the interval $(0,t)$).

Now we'll use this and Borel-Cantelli to show that with positive probability, we can construct $\sigma$ and a sequence of times $t_n\uparrow 1$ such that $Y_{t_n}=1$ for all $n$.

Let $\alpha_n$ be some sequence decreasing to 0 quickly enough that $\sum (1-p_{\alpha_n}) <\infty$.

Let $t_0=0$ and recursively define $t_1, t_2, \dots$ as follows.

Given $t_n<1$ and $Y(t_n)=0$, let $\sigma_t=\sqrt{\alpha_n}$ for $t\in(t_n, (1+t_n)/2)$, and let $\sigma_t=1$ for $t\in((1+t_n)/2, t_{n+1})$, where $t_{n+1}$ is defined by

$t_{n+1}=\inf \big[ t>(1+t_n)/2: Y_t=0 \big]$.

The idea of this definition: given $t_n<1$, we divide the remaining time interval $(t_n, 1)$ into two halves, and run BM at speed $\alpha_n$ on the first half and at speed 1 on the second half, stopping as soon as we hit 0 during the second half. Since we start at 0, the probability that we DO hit 0 at some point during the second half is easily seen to be $p_{\alpha_n}$ as defined above. Hence $P(t_{n+1}<1 | t_n<1)=p_{\alpha_n}$.

Now using Borel-Cantelli (and reasoning straightforwardly about independence) we get that there is positive probability that $t_n<1$ for all $n$. In that case also $t_n\uparrow 1$ (since $1-t_{n+1}<(1-t_{n})/2$). Also $Y_{t_n}=0$ for all $n$ by construction. But the process $Y_t$ is continuous (since $\sigma_t$ is bounded). So then also $Y_1=0$ as desired.

share|improve this answer
    
Dear James, Elegant example. In the above,$\sigma_t$ in the first half shall be $\sigma_t = \sqrt{\alpha_n}$? Also, if we restrict $\alpha_t >K>0$ for some constant $K$, then is it possible to prove the above claim $P(Y_1 = c) = 0$? –  kenneth Dec 26 '11 at 7:10
    
Hi Kenneth - yes indeed I meant $\sqrt{\alpha_n}$, thanks, edited. –  James Martin Dec 26 '11 at 13:30
    
I think if $\sigma$ is bounded away from zero as well as from above, then indeed your conclusion follows. Haven't though through the details, but I think you can get a uniform bound above on $P(Y_1=0 | \cal{F}_t)$ for all $t<1$, since it's bounded above by the probability of seeing a zero of a BM in a time interval $x(1-t), y(1-t)$ for some fixed $x$, $y$, which can be bounded above uniformly in the starting point in a way that doesn't depend on $t$. But the event $Y_1=0$ is also determined by the intersection of $\cal{F}_t$ over $t<1$; I think this can be used to give the desired conclusion. –  James Martin Dec 26 '11 at 13:31
    
Hi James, Thanks for the hint. Unfortunately, I could not follow your idea completely. Could you make it a bit more detail? –  kenneth Dec 26 '11 at 14:56
1  
@James: If $\sigma$ is also bounded away from zero, then I think that $Y_1$ has an absolutely continuous probability distribution, with bounded density. –  George Lowther Dec 27 '11 at 1:16
show 7 more comments

I have not thought about such questions for a while, but I do not see an immediate mistake in the following reasoning:

Let $Y_t=E[\mathrm{sign}(W_1)| \mathcal{F}_t]$. Then it is a bounded martingale, and it also has a continuous modification since $Y_t=E[\mathrm{sign}(W_1) | W_t]$ and $E[\mathrm{sign}(W_1) | W_t=x]$ depends on $t$ and $x$ continuously. Therefore, it admits a representation via stochastic integral, but $P(Y_t=\pm1 )=1/2$.

This does not contradict the stochastic representation since $\sigma_t$ in it becomes increasingly large if $t$ is close to 1, but the process is far from $\pm1$. This diffusion pushes the process closer to the boundaries of $[-1,1]$.

Is this true, or am I missing something?

share|improve this answer
    
Dear Yuri, Thanks for the simple construction. It seems to me correct. Except one possible typo: $P(Y_t = \pm 1) = 1/2)$ shall be $P(Y_1 = \pm 1) = 1/2)$? BTW, $Y_t$ admits explicit representation from direct computation: $Y_t = \sqrt{1-t} ( 1 - 2 \Phi(-W_t/\sqrt{1-t})).$ –  kenneth Dec 26 '11 at 3:34
    
Dear Yuri, $\sigma_t$ shall be given bounded as condition, but your example has to make $\sigma_t$ blow up near 1, as you mentioned. –  kenneth Dec 26 '11 at 3:37
    
This all looks correct, except that $\sigma_t$ is not bounded, so is not a counterexample to the original question. –  George Lowther Dec 26 '11 at 14:17
    
Yes, I missed the boundedness requirement in the question, sorry. The example given by James is great, I just +1'ed it. –  Yuri Bakhtin Dec 26 '11 at 15:08
add comment

Another counter-example: Let $f:R\to R$ be a non-constant $C^2$ funtion with $f, f', f''$ all bounded, and such that (i) $f$ vanishes in a non-empty open interval $I$, (ii) $f'>0$ outside the closure of $I$, and (iii) $E[f(W_1)]=0$. Consider the random variable $Y_1:= f(W_1)$. Clearly $P[Y_1=0]= P[W_1\in I]>0$. The process $$ \sigma_t(\omega):=h(t,W_t(\omega)), $$ where $$ h(t,x) :=\cases{\int_R {1\over\sqrt{2\pi(1-t)}} \exp[-(y-x)^2/2(1-t)] f'(y) dy,& 0\le t<1,\cr 0,&t\ge 1,\cr} $$ is predictable and bounded, and $\sigma_t(\omega)>0$ fo all $t\in[0,1)$ and all $\omega\in \Omega$. Moreover, by Ito's formula, $$ Y_1=\int_0^1 \sigma_t dW_t, $$ almost surely. In fact, $$ E[f(W_1)|{\mathcal F}_s]=\int_0^s \sigma_t\,dW_t,\qquad\forall s>0, $$ almost surely.

share|improve this answer
add comment

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.