Sign up ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Let k be a field and let X be scheme over k. Let K be a field extension of k and denote by $X_K$ the base-change of X to Spec K. Under what conditions is the canonical map of Picard groups $Pic(X)\to Pic(X_K)$, induced by the projection, injective? I know that this is true if X is geometrically integral and proper over k, but what if X is only of finite type, separated and geometrically integral over k?

share|cite|improve this question

3 Answers 3

This is not true. Let $E$ be an elliptic curve over $\mathbb{R}$, such that $E(\mathbb{R})$ has one connected component. Let $u$ be a point of $E(\mathbb{C}) \setminus E(\mathbb{R})$. Writing $\sigma$ for complex conjugation; $u + \sigma(u)$ is in $E(\mathbb{R})$. Two of the solutions to $2v=u + \sigma(u)$ are real and the other two are complex conjugate to each other; let $v$ and $\sigma(v)$ be the complex conjugate pair. So

$$2v=2\sigma(v) = u + \sigma(u)$$

in the group law of $E$.

Now, let $X = E \setminus \{ v, \sigma(v) \}$ and consider the line bundle $L:=\mathcal{O}(u + \sigma(u))$. Since this is a $\sigma$ invariant divisor, the line bundle $L$ is defined over $\mathbb{R}$. I claim that $L$ is nontrivial, but becomes trivial after base extending to $\mathbb{C}$.

Proof that $L$ is nontrivial: If not, there would be a real function $f$ on $X$, with zero divisor precisely $u + \sigma(u)$. Extending to a meromorphic function on $E$, we would have $$u + \sigma(u) = k v + (2-k) \sigma(v).$$ But, since $f$ is $\sigma$ invariant, it has poles of the same order at $v$ and $\sigma(v)$, so $u + \sigma(u) = v + \sigma(v)$. Using the linear relation $u + \sigma(u) = 2v$, we deduce that $v = \sigma(v)$, contradicting that $v$ was chosen not to be real.

Proof that $L \times_{\mathbb{R}} \mathbb{C}$ is trivial: The relation $u + \sigma(u) = 2v$ means there is a meromorphic function on $E$ with zeroes at $u$ and $\sigma(u)$, and a double pole at $v$. Restricting this function $X$, we get a trivialization of $L$.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is a nice answer. (I previously had answered the question incorrectly, and with no justification.) In the case of curves (as above), it is related to an exact sequence of Mike Rosen: see equation (2) on p. 6 of – Pete L. Clark Dec 9 '09 at 19:03
In the case of Galois extension K/k one can explicitly describe the kernel of $Pic(X) \to Pic(X_K)$. I believe it's equal to $H^1(G, K[X]^*)$. It is a part of 5-term exact sequence coming from a Hochshild-Serre spectral sequence, associated to Galois covering $X_K \to X$. – Evgeny Shinder Dec 9 '09 at 22:08
In particualar, when $K[X]^* = K^*$, the kernel is zero by Hilbert 90. – Evgeny Shinder Dec 9 '09 at 22:09
David, this is a really great answer, thanks a lot for this beautiful example (I'm the one who asked this question before I had a real account here). – Philipp Hartwig Jan 17 '10 at 21:59

Perhaps it is worth recording a simple example: let $X_k= \text{Spec}(k[x,y]/(x^2+y^2-1))$. Then $\text{Pic}(X_{\mathbb R}) = \mathbb Z/(2)$ while $\text{Pic}(X_{\mathbb C}) = \mathbb 0$, see Fossum's book "Divisor class groups of Krull domains", Prop 11.8.

share|cite|improve this answer
This is one of my favorite examples in algebra: see Theorem 12 of – Pete L. Clark Oct 15 '10 at 17:46
@Pete: thanks! Your note looks beautiful, I will try to read more. – Hailong Dao Oct 15 '10 at 17:50

On an integral, proper scheme X over k a line bundle L is trivial if and only if both L and its dual have a non-zero global section. This can be checked after an arbitrary field extension. The proof of this criterion uses that the global section of O_X are a field. See for example the proof of Corollary II.5.6 in Mumford's book on abelian varieties.

share|cite|improve this answer

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.