Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

Dear Mathoverflowers:

I am interested in radial positive solutions of $-\Delta u(r) = r^\alpha u(r)^p$ in the unit ball in $ R^N$ with $ u=0$ on the boundary.

Here $p>1$ and $ \alpha >0$. (There is a positive solution provided $ p<\frac{N+2+2\alpha}{N-2}$, Ni 82).

I am interested in when I can say the associated linearized operator $L:= -\Delta - p r^\alpha u(r)^{p-1}$ does not have zero as an eigenvalue.

Are there any standard methods for attempting to show this?

thanks in advance.

craig

share|improve this question
    
Since $p>1$ if you know that $u(r)\leq 1$ then $u(r)$ is a supersolution to your linearized operator $L$ (technically $u(r)$ is a supersolution to $-L$). In this case, since $L$ is a Schrodinger operator there is a classical result of Fischer-Colbrie and Schoen * that the operator $L$ has non-negative spectrum (with positivity unless $u$ is a solution to $L$). Of course I don't know if $u(r)\leq 1$ is plausible... *"The structure of complete stable minimal surfaces in 3-manifolds of nonnegative scalar curvature" Comm. Pure Appl. Math. Vol. 30, 199-211 1980. –  Rbega Dec 12 '11 at 20:27
    
I must be missing something but I don't see where the $ u(r) \le 1$ is helping anything. As mentioned below I know the first eigenvalue of $L$ is negative, so i think this will cause a problem. I will dig up reference. Thanks. –  greg Dec 13 '11 at 1:52
    
You're right I was a little to quick with my computation you would need $u\geq p$ to get a super solution, which is of course ridiculous. –  Rbega Dec 13 '11 at 2:36

2 Answers 2

$L$ is invertible if $pr^\alpha u(r)^{p-1}$ is small in a certain sense, cf. Gilbrag-Trudinger. In the general case I don't know anything except to mention the Fredholm or spectral theories. If you need a result for a particular $u$ (and $\alpha$ and $p$) perhaps there are some rigorous numerical methods. I would be interested in other answers.

Update: One potential approach would be to show first that any solution must be radially symmetric and then use ODE methods to the equation obtained.

share|improve this answer
    
Thanks for response. I believe here you are refering to the result that says if the $L^\frac{N}{2}$ norm of the quantity in question is small with regards to Sobolev imbedding constant, then $L$ has the maximum principle? In any case I don't think this will work since the first eigenvalue of $L$ is negative. I will look into your other commments. Thanks again. –  greg Dec 13 '11 at 1:46
    
The first eigenvalue of $L=-\Delta-V$ is not negative, if $V$ is small enough. There is a smallness condition involving the width of the domain etc. Intuitively, the first eigenvalue of $-\Delta$ is strictly positive, so one still has a room for subtracting something small. –  timur Dec 13 '11 at 3:18
    
I meant in the particular case where $L = -\Delta - r^\alpha u(r)^{p-1}$ and where $u$ is a positive solution of the given PDE. If the first eigenvalue was non-negative then one would obtain $ \int | \nabla \psi|^2 \ge \int p r^\alpha u^{p-1} \psi^2$ for all $ \psi $ which are zero on the boundary. Putting $ \psi=u$ into this inequality would show that $ u=0$. –  greg Dec 13 '11 at 3:40
    
@greg, have you looked at ODE methods? –  timur Dec 13 '11 at 13:57
    
I have looked at ODE methods in the sense that I have played around with radial functions and taken derivatives and....but no real explicit radial methods... What I suspect is that there is no radial solution $v$ of $L(v)=0$. The reason I think this is that in this case a change of variables can remove the term $ r^\alpha$ from all the equations, and then there are known results. Let me explain where this is coming from, which i do below, since maybe I don't even need what I am asking for. –  greg Dec 13 '11 at 14:16

Here I explain where the original problem is coming from, since it is quite possible I don't need what I am asking for.

I am interested in obtaining positive solutions of the equation $ -\Delta u(x) + t H(u) = g(t,x) u^p $ in $B$ with $ u=0$ on the boundary of $B$. Here $H$ is some second order linear elliptic operator, $t \in R$. My interest is in obtaining positive solutions $u$ for a various values of $t$ close to zero (I don't care if I can only get solutions for $t$ on one side of zero. Also $ g(0,x) =|x|^\alpha$. Also $p$ is in general supercritical. So what I was attempting to do what perturb off of the radial positive solution using the implicit function theorem, and this was why I needed the non-degeneracy. But I would be happy to use another abstract result that would allow me to obtain solutions by perturbing off of the radial solution.

thanks for all your help.

share|improve this answer
    
and I guess I was supposed to edit my original question and not answer my own question... still trying to figure out how to use this site. –  greg Dec 13 '11 at 14:32
    
Two techniques come to mind: Sub-supersolution method, and Leray-Schauder approach. If you need, I can expand on any of these. –  timur Dec 13 '11 at 17:10
    
I am quite familar with the sub/supersolution approach, and was unable to get it to work. What are your ideas on the second approach? thanks for all your help. –  greg Dec 13 '11 at 20:16

Your Answer

 
discard

By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.