Take the 2-minute tour ×
MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. It's 100% free, no registration required.

hi,

i have the following question: Let $M$ be a n-dimensional manifold (or riemannian or everything thats nice ...) and let $\mathcal{F}$ be a foliation of $M$ by surfaces. Assume, furthermore, that on each leaf $\mathcal{L}$ there is a two form $\alpha_{\mathcal{L}}$. is it possible to construct a globally defined (smooth) 2-form $\alpha$ on $M$ out of the $\alpha_{\mathcal{L}}$? or are there any good books or papers were this is discussed? thanks in advance.

janson

share|improve this question

closed as too localized by Ryan Budney, Deane Yang, Willie Wong, Alain Valette, Mark Sapir Dec 5 '11 at 6:37

This question is unlikely to help any future visitors; it is only relevant to a small geographic area, a specific moment in time, or an extraordinarily narrow situation that is not generally applicable to the worldwide audience of the internet. For help making this question more broadly applicable, visit the help center.If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

    
You appear to have misspelled your own name. As another person named "Jason", this has happened to me as well. –  Jason Starr Dec 3 '11 at 13:55
    
upps sorry ... actually its janson :). –  gary Dec 3 '11 at 13:57
2  
What do you mean by $\alpha$ is defined on the foliation -- which topology on the foliation are you using -- is there any sense in which $\alpha$ is continuous or differentiable? Perhaps give a concrete example using an irrational foliation of the torus to let us know what context you're using. Regardless you question seems likely best-suited for math.stackexchange.com. –  Ryan Budney Dec 3 '11 at 20:35

1 Answer 1

When your manifold is Riemanniann, you can do something obvious: compose $\alpha_{\mathbb{L}}$ with the orthogonal projection from $T_x M$ to $T_x \mathcal{L}$ when $x\in \mathcal{L}$. But you will need some transverse regularity for the $\alpha_{\mathcal{L}}$ to ensure the resulting form to be smooth. This is not really a restriction, since anyway you can easily see that there are families of $\alpha_{\mathcal{L}}$ such that no $2$-forms $\alpha$ on $M$ can be smooth and restrict to $\alpha_{\mathcal{L}}$ along each leaf.

Edit: About the "transverse regularity": if you compute the form $\alpha$ I propose, you'll see that it need not be smooth (or even continuous !); you need to assume that $\alpha_{\mathcal{L}_x}$ (where $\mathcal{L}_x$ is the leaf through $x$), depends smoothly on $x$. This is stronger than asking that each $\alpha_{\mathcal{L}}$ is smooth along $\mathcal{L}$; the difference is mainly about transverse variation of the base point.

share|improve this answer
    
what do you mean by a transverse regularity for the $\alpha_{\mathcal{L}}$ ? –  gary Dec 3 '11 at 14:20
    
if i had this regularity, does this ensure the smootness of $\alpha$? –  gary Dec 3 '11 at 14:23

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.