MathOverflow is a question and answer site for professional mathematicians. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Could someone please point me towards a proof of why the image of a Galois representation on the Tate-module of an abelian variety is limited by its Mumford-Tate group?

share|cite|improve this question
up vote 12 down vote accepted

This is an immediate consequence of Theorem 2.11 and Proposition 2.9 in Deligne's 'Hodge cycles on abelian varieties' (notes by Milne available here:

2.11 shows that every Hodge cycle on an abelian variety $A$ over a field $k$ embeddable in $\mathbb{C}$ is absolutely Hodge, and 2.9 shows that all absolutely Hodge cycles are defined over a finite extension of $k$. So it follows that all Hodge cycles on an abelian variety have canonical $l$-adic realizations that are defined over the same finite extension of $k$. In particular, an open sub-group of the Galois group fixes all Hodge cycles; that is, it maps into the Mumford-Tate group of $A$.

share|cite|improve this answer
thanks Keerthi! – Adam Harris Dec 1 '11 at 20:17

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.