Good evening,
Can someone explain to me the notion of internality in model theory (what it is, where it comes from...) ?
Thank you
|
1
|
Good evening, Can someone explain to me the notion of internality in model theory (what it is, where it comes from...) ? Thank you |
||||||||||||||||
|
|
6
|
The standard use in model theory is something like this. A partial type $p$ is internal to a type $q$ if there is a definable function $f$ such that any realization of $p$ is equal to $f(c_1,\dots,c_m)$ where $c_1,\dots,c_m$ are realizations of $q$. A typical example from differential fields: Let $X$ be the set of solutions of a linear differential equation of order $n$. Then $X$ is internal to the constants. Let $a_1,\dots,a_n$ be a fundamental system of solutions. Let $f(c_1,\dots,c_n)=\sum c_ia_i$. Then every element of $X$ is the image of an $n$-tuple of constants. |
|||
|
|
|
3
|
The use of 'internality' in model theory that is most familiar to me is its use in nonstandard analysis. Look at 'internal' in the wikipedia article on non-standard analysis and see if that is what you remember. |
|||||
|
|
0
|
Thank you Buschi for your help but David Roberts is right en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Model_theory is what I meant. @David Roberts Thank you for your answer. I heard this term in a seminar. I can't give specific reference but I'm a beginner. |
||
|
|
|
0
|
Could you be thinking of Skolem's Paradox? It is sometimes explained in terms of "internal sets", the sets that a model can "see". Example: That's a description of why a theory containing the power set of the integers still has a countable model. The model doesn't actually contain the full powerset, but it also doesn't contain a bijection between its integers and its sets of integers, so "internally" the power set is uncountable even though it's countable "externally". If that's what you're looking for, then http://math.stackexchange.com is probably a better place than here for follow-up discussion. |
|||
|
|