MathOverflow will be down for maintenance for approximately 3 hours, starting Monday evening (06/24/2013) at approximately 9:00 PM Eastern time (UTC-4).

## two real closed fields- algebraic elements

If R_1\subset R_2 are two real closed fields (R_2 is an extension of R_1), then is it always the case that R_1 contains {R_2}_alg; By the latter I mean algebraic elements of R_2.

-

What do you mean by "algebraic elements of $R_2$"? Do you mean those elements that are algebraic over $R_1$? Then the answer is yes. There is a straightforward proof: the only algebraic extension of $R_1$ is $R_1[i]$, and $i \notin R_2$. (where $i^2 = -1$)

-
 As far as I know, "algebraic" without an "over $k$" clause, always means algebraic over the prime field, in this case $\mathbb Q$. – Andreas Blass Dec 12 2011 at 19:25 That was my first thought too, but that makes the question nearly trivial. – Hurkyl Dec 12 2011 at 22:22

I think I've found it out. If R_1\subset R_2 are two real closed fields, then (R_1)_alg should be the same as (R_2)_alg, since otherwise (R_2)_alg would be a proper real extension of (R_1)_alg contradicting real-closedness of (R_1)_alg.

-
 And are both of these identified with the algebraic reals? – Gerald Edgar Nov 28 2011 at 14:23 @Gerald Edgar: Yes, the algebraic elements of any real-closed field are (under the obvious identification) the algebraic reals. – Andreas Blass Dec 12 2011 at 17:11